Unlocking biodiversity data: Prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe

Abstract Large quantities of biodiversity data are required to assess the current status of species, to identify drivers of population and distributional change, and to predict changes to biodiversity under future scenarios. Nevertheless, currently-available data are often not well-suited to these purposes. To highlight existing gaps, we assess the availability of species observation data in Europe, their geographic and temporal range, and their quality. We do so by reviewing the most relevant sources for European biodiversity observation data, and identifying important barriers to filling gaps. We suggest strategies, tools and frameworks to continue to fill these gaps, in addition to producing data suitable for generating Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs). Our review of data sources shows that only around a third of data-providers provide unrestricted data access. Particularly large geographic gaps exist in Eastern European countries and many datasets are not suitable for generating EBVs due to the absence of long-term data. We highlight examples built on recent experiences from large data integrators, publishers and networks that help to efficiently improve data availability, adopt open science principles and close existing data gaps. Future strategies must urgently consider the needs of relevant data stakeholders, particularly science- and policy-related needs, and provide incentives for data-providers. Hence, sustainable, long-term infrastructures and a European biodiversity network are needed to provide such efficient workflows, incentives for data-provision and tools.

[1]  Tatsuya Amano,et al.  Spatial Gaps in Global Biodiversity Information and the Role of Citizen Science , 2016 .

[2]  Carsten Nowak,et al.  Hair trapping with valerian-treated lure sticks as a tool for genetic wildcat monitoring in low-density habitats , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[3]  Anne Bowser,et al.  Building essential biodiversity variables(EBVs) of species distribution and abundanceat a global scale , 2017 .

[4]  Patricia Mergen,et al.  The roles and contributions of Biodiversity Observation Networks (BONs) in better tracking progress to 2020 biodiversity targets: a European case study , 2015 .

[5]  J. Clobert,et al.  Advantages of Volunteer‐Based Biodiversity Monitoring in Europe , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  Estimating the cost of different strategies for measuring farmland biodiversity: Evidence from a Europe-wide field evaluation , 2014 .

[7]  Martin J. Westgate,et al.  Adaptive management of biological systems: A review , 2013 .

[8]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[9]  Hugh Drummond,et al.  Archiving Primary Data: Solutions for Long-Term Studies. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Louise McRae,et al.  Global biodiversity monitoring: From data sources to Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2017 .

[11]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research , 2015 .

[12]  Limei Han,et al.  [Allelopathy of root exudates from two genotypes soybeans on root pathogenic fungi]. , 2005, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[13]  S. Jähnig,et al.  The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[14]  Dirk S. Schmeller,et al.  Setting temporal baselines for biodiversity: the limits of available monitoring data for capturing the full impact of anthropogenic pressures , 2017, Scientific reports.

[15]  Peter Haase,et al.  A suite of essential biodiversity variables for detecting critical biodiversity change , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[16]  Anne Bowser,et al.  Building essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  Philip A. Stephens,et al.  Assessing the Performance of EU Nature Legislation in Protecting Target Bird Species in an Era of Climate Change , 2016 .

[18]  Tetsukazu Yahara,et al.  Towards a global terrestrial species monitoring program , 2015 .

[19]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[20]  Anne Bowser,et al.  An operational definition of essential biodiversity variables , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[21]  J. K. Legind,et al.  Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring , 2017 .

[22]  Dirk S. Schmeller,et al.  Bird-monitoring in Europe – a first overview of practices, motivations and aims , 2012 .

[23]  Gregor Hagedorn,et al.  Fauna Europaea – all European animal species on the web , 2014, Biodiversity data journal.

[24]  Florian Wetzel,et al.  The need for an integrated biodiversity policy support process – Building the European contribution to a global Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) , 2014 .

[25]  Quentin Groom,et al.  Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project , 2016 .

[26]  Ben Collen,et al.  The Tropical Biodiversity Data Gap: Addressing Disparity in Global Monitoring , 2008 .

[27]  Stefan Stoll,et al.  The long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Relevance, current status, future perspective and examples from marine, freshwater and terrestrial long-term observation , 2016 .

[28]  Ben Collen,et al.  Wildlife comeback in Europe: the recovery of selected mammal and bird species , 2013 .

[29]  Lauren V. Weatherdon,et al.  Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations , 2017 .

[30]  Quentin J. Groom,et al.  Piecing together the biogeographic history of Chenopodium vulvaria L. using botanical literature and collections , 2015, PeerJ.

[31]  Quentin Groom,et al.  The importance of open data for invasive alien species research, policy and management , 2015 .

[32]  Vishwas Chavan,et al.  The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[33]  H. Pereira,et al.  Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  Louise McRae,et al.  Priorities for big biodiversity data , 2017 .

[35]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[36]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Taking stock of nature: Essential biodiversity variables explained , 2017 .

[37]  Peter Haase,et al.  Bridging the gap between biodiversity data and policy reporting needs: An Essential Biodiversity Variables perspective , 2016 .

[38]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data , 2010, PLoS biology.