Measurement and model error assessment of a single-pixel frequency-domain photon migration apparatus and diffusion model for imaging applications

Research into the near-infrared biomedical optical imaging has produced a multitude of inverse imaging algorithms. Recent experience has shown that when these algorithms are tested with experimental data, they falter due to a mismatch between observed and simulated measurements. When considering measurements for imaging, one must consider both measurement and model error. If data is recorded properly, then measurement error tends to be normally distributed with a mean of zero. Model error can be biased and spatially correlated due to inaccuracies in the diffusion approximation, inaccurate parameter estimates, numerical error, and other factors. This contribution discusses trends in the measurement and model error observed from measurements on a single-pixel, frequency domain photon migration system developed for biomedical optical imaging. In order to reduce the model error bias, an empirical approach was applied to find experimental variables that significantly affect it. This approach reduced the mean of the model error on a test data set and produced a slight smoothing effect on its distribution. Image reconstruction attempts show that the modified data set produces an improved image over the image reconstructed from the raw data set. To our knowledge, this is the first time that model and measurement error information have been incorporated into a three dimensional image reconstruction algorithm.

[1]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Initial assessment of a simple system for frequency domain diffuse optical tomography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  M J Eppstein,et al.  Biomedical optical tomography using dynamic parameterization and bayesian conditioning on photon migration measurements. , 1999, Applied optics.

[3]  R. Barbour,et al.  Frequency-domain optical imaging of absorption and scattering distributions by a Born iterative method. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  C. L. Hutchinson,et al.  Fluorescence and Absorption Contrast Mechanisms for Biomedical Optical Imaging Using Frequency‐Domain Techniques , 1997, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[5]  E M Sevick-Muraca,et al.  Origin of phosphorescence signals reemitted from tissues. , 1994, Optics letters.

[6]  J E Bugaj,et al.  Stabilization of the Optical Tracer Agent Indocyanine Green Using Noncovalent Interactions , 2000, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[7]  M. Eppstein,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF TRANSMISSIVITY VALUES AND ZONATION , 1996 .

[8]  A Ishimaru,et al.  Diffusion of light in turbid material. , 1989, Applied optics.

[9]  Margaret J. Eppstein,et al.  3-D Bayesian Optical Image Reconstruction with Domain Decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  Willem M. Star,et al.  Optical diffusion in layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[11]  M S Patterson,et al.  Error assessment of a wavelength tunable frequency domain system for noninvasive tissue spectroscopy. , 1996, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .