Using the curriculum emphasis concept to investigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform

This paper reports a study on teachers’ domain‐specific beliefs about the chemistry curriculum for upper‐secondary education in The Netherlands. Teachers’ beliefs were investigated using a questionnaire focused on the goals of the chemistry curriculum. The design of the questionnaire was based on three curriculum emphases: ‘fundamental chemistry’, ‘chemistry, technology and society’, and ‘knowledge development in chemistry’. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of Dutch chemistry teachers. The results indicate that, on the whole, the curriculum emphasis ‘fundamental chemistry’ received the strongest support. This is in accordance with the content and the tradition of the Dutch chemistry curriculum. When the two types of upper‐secondary education were compared, it appeared that ‘chemistry, technology and society’ was almost equally valued for both types of education. However, the curriculum emphasis, ‘knowledge development in chemistry’, was considered much more important for pre‐university education than for senior general secondary education.

[1]  D. Kagan Ways of Evaluating Teacher Cognition: Inferences Concerning the Goldilocks Principle , 1990 .

[2]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Normal Science Education and its Dangers: The Case of School Chemistry , 2000 .

[3]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[4]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[5]  Peter J. Fensham The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: three Australian case stories , 1998 .

[6]  S. Bolhuis,et al.  Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: what do teachers do? , 2001 .

[7]  Charles R. Coble,et al.  Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[8]  Judith Bennett,et al.  Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and What Are Their Effects? , 2002 .

[9]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[10]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge , 1992 .

[11]  Douglas A. Roberts Junior high school science transformed: analysing a science curriculum policy change , 1995 .

[12]  Wobbe de Vos,et al.  Public Understanding of Science as a Separate Subject in Secondary Schools in The Netherlands. , 1999 .

[13]  K. Johnston High School Science Teachers’ Conceptualisations of Teaching and Learning: theory and practice , 1991 .

[14]  Leif Östman,et al.  Discourses, discursive meanings and socialization in chemistry education , 1996 .

[15]  The Reflective Deliberator: a Case Study of Curriculum Policymaking , 1985 .

[16]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Chemistry Curricula for General Education: Analysis and Elements of A Design , 2002 .

[17]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  What Counts as Science Education? , 2007 .

[18]  N. Verloop,et al.  The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation , 2005, Science Teachers’ Knowledge Development.

[19]  Douglas A. Roberts,et al.  Developing the concept of “curriculum emphases” in science education , 1982 .