Stochastic printing failures in extreme ultraviolet lithography

Stochastic effects in lithography are known to be the cause of critical dimension (CD) variability, quantified, e.g., by linewidth roughness or local CD uniformity, but—when the CDs are small—they can also lead to printing failures, and hence have a significant impact on yield. We will focus on these printing failures and review three important topics in this relatively new field. First, we will look at how these failures can be detected and show how either CD-SEM, e-beam inspection, and optical defect inspection can play a useful role. Next, we consider the important question of how the stochastic failure probability (which we quantify by a metric we call “Not OK,” abbreviated NOK) depends on the lithography- and process-settings, a question that is of obvious importance when looking for conditions that will minimize the failure probability and hence maximize the yield. Finally, we will discuss to what extent we can fit experimentally observed failure probabilities, to empirical models. Such models can play a vital role in future OPC-verification flows, where screening full mask layouts for “stochastic hot spots” is expected to become a mandatory step.

[1]  Peter De Bisschop,et al.  Stochastic effects in EUV lithography: random, local CD variability, and printing failures , 2017 .

[2]  Chris A. Mack Line-edge roughness and the ultimate limits of lithography , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  EUV photoresist patterning characterization for imec N7/N5 technology , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Mesoscale kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of molecular resists: the effect of PAG homogeneity on resolution, LER, and sensitivity , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Steven G. Hansen,et al.  Photoresist and stochastic modeling , 2018 .

[6]  Robert L. Bristol,et al.  The tri-lateral challenge of resolution, photospeed, and LER: scaling below 50nm? , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Hiroshi Morita,et al.  Meso-scale simulation of the line-edge structure based on polymer chains in the developing and rinse process , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Philippe Foubert,et al.  Technology for defectivity improvement in resist coating and developing process in EUV lithography process , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[9]  Mark Neisser,et al.  LWR study on resist formulation parameters , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  EUV vote-taking lithography: crazy... or not? , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Danilo De Simone,et al.  EUV reticle print verification with advanced broadband optical wafer inspection and e-Beam review systems , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[12]  Trey Graves,et al.  Mechanistic simulation of line-edge roughness , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Bruno M. La Fontaine,et al.  Characterization of line-edge roughness in photoresist using an image fading technique , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Yoshihiko Hirai,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Study of Line Edge Roughness and the Proximity Effect in Electron Beam Lithography , 2015 .

[15]  David Blankenship,et al.  Resist pattern prediction at EUV , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Resolution, LER, and sensitivity limitations of photoresists , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[17]  S. Meyers,et al.  A numeric model for the imaging mechanism of metal oxide EUV resists , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Chao Fang,et al.  Optimization of a virtual EUV photoresist for the trade-off between throughput and CDU , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[19]  A. Vaglio Pret,et al.  Impact of stochastic effects on EUV printability limits , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Alok Vaid,et al.  In-line E-beam wafer metrology and defect inspection: the end of an era for image-based critical dimensional metrology? New life for defect inspection , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Stephen Hsu,et al.  EUV resolution enhancement techniques (RETs) for k1 0.4 and below , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[22]  Alessandro Vaglio Pret,et al.  Comparative stochastic process variation bands for N7, N5, and N3 at EUV , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[23]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Enabling CD SEM metrology for 5nm technology node and beyond , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  Improvements in resist performance towards EUV HVM , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[25]  Katja Viatkina,et al.  Integrated approach to improving local CD uniformity in EUV patterning , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[26]  Peter De Bisschop How to make lithography patterns print: the role of OPC and pattern layout , 2015 .

[27]  Marie Krysak,et al.  Lithographic stochastics: beyond 3σ , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[28]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  The Role of Underlayers in EUVL , 2018, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology.

[29]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Polymer dissolution model: an energy adaptation of the critical ionization theory , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[30]  John Arnold,et al.  Introduction of pre-etch deposition techniques in EUV patterning , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[31]  Lewis W. Flanagin,et al.  Advancements to the critical ionization dissolution model , 2002 .

[32]  Gregg M. Gallatin Resist blur and line edge roughness (Invited Paper) , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[33]  E. Hendrickx,et al.  Stochastic effects in EUV lithography , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[34]  Yongan Xu,et al.  Coater/developer based techniques to improve high-resolution EUV patterning defectivity , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[35]  Jeffrey Shearer,et al.  Defect detection strategies and process partitioning for SE EUV patterning , 2018, Advanced Lithography.