Predicting bone strength from CT data: Clinical applications.

In this review we summarise over 15 years of research and development around the prediction of whole bones strength from Computed Tomography data, with particular reference to the prediction of the risk of hip fracture in osteoporotic patients. We briefly discuss the theoretical background, and then provide a summary of the laboratory and clinical validation of these modelling technologies. We then discuss the three current clinical applications: in clinical research, in clinical trials, and in clinical practice. On average the strength predicted with finite element models (QCT-FE) based on computed tomography is 7% more accurate that that predicted with areal bone mineral density from Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA-aBMD), the current standard of care, both in term of laboratory validation on cadaver bones and in terms of stratification accuracy on clinical cohorts of fractured and non-fractured women. This improved accuracy makes QCT-FE superior to DXA-aBMD in clinical research and in clinical trials, where the its use can cut in half the number of patients to be enrolled to get the same statistical power. For routine clinical use to decide who to treat with antiresorptive drugs, QCT-FE is more accurate but less cost-effective than DXA-aBMD, at least when the decision is on first line treatment like bisphosphonates. But the ability to predict skeletal strength from medical imaging is now opening a number of other applications, for example in paediatrics and oncology.

[1]  O. Johnell,et al.  World-wide Projections for Hip Fracture , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[2]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study. , 2018, Bone.

[3]  H. Genant,et al.  Comparison of proximal femur and vertebral body strength improvements in the FREEDOM trial using an alternative finite element methodology. , 2015, Bone.

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  M Viceconti,et al.  A new method for the automatic mesh generation of bone segments from CT data. , 1999, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A multiscale model to predict current absolute risk of femoral fracture in a postmenopausal population , 2018, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[10]  Chengwen Chu,et al.  Fully automatic reconstruction of personalized 3D volumes of the proximal femur from 2D X-ray images , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[11]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Investigating the mechanical response of paediatric bone under bending and torsion using finite element analysis , 2018, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[13]  W. Skalli,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mechanical strength of a femoral reconstruction in paediatric oncology: A finite element study , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Developing CT based computational models of pediatric femurs. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. , 2013, Bone.

[17]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strengthening Clinically Useful? , 2018, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[20]  A. Høiseth,et al.  Denosumab Reduces Cortical Porosity of the Proximal Femoral Shaft in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Are spontaneous fractures possible? An example of clinical application for personalised, multiscale neuro-musculo-skeletal modelling. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  O. Johnell,et al.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  Yohan Payan,et al.  A fast and robust patient specific Finite Element mesh registration technique: Application to 60 clinical cases , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[24]  D. Ruffoni,et al.  High-throughput quantification of the mechanical competence of murine femora--a highly automated approach for large-scale genetic studies. , 2013, Bone.

[25]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS) , 2018, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  A. Alho,et al.  Bending strength of the femur in relation to non-invasive bone mineral assessment. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Bone Strength at Clinically Relevant Sites Displays Substantial Heterogeneity and Is Best Predicted From Site‐Specific Bone Densitometry , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Gaussian mixture models based 2D–3D registration of bone shapes for orthopedic surgery planning , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[29]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  R. Eastell,et al.  Distribution of bone density and cortical thickness in the proximal femur and their association with hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a quantitative computed tomography study , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[32]  P. Bifulco,et al.  Towards a patient-specific estimation of intra-operative femoral fracture risk , 2018, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[33]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Automatic generation of finite element meshes from computed tomography data. , 2003, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[34]  F. Taddei,et al.  To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations? , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Yifei Dai,et al.  Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Gregory Chang,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States. , 2017, Radiology.

[37]  J Q Campbell,et al.  Automated finite element meshing of the lumbar spine: Verification and validation with 18 specimen-specific models. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  G Lowet,et al.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. , 1997, Bone.

[39]  Kyoung-Tak Kang,et al.  Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[40]  David Mitton,et al.  Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT). , 2016, Radiology.

[41]  B. Bach,et al.  Automated 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allows for Accurate Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss Compared With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. , 2019, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.