Obtaining maximum muscle excitation for normalizing shoulder electromyography in dynamic contractions.

Muscle specific maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) are commonly used to elicit reference amplitudes to normalize electromyographic signals (EMG). It has been questioned whether this is appropriate for normalizing EMG from dynamic contractions. This study compares EMG amplitude when shoulder muscle activity from dynamic contractions is normalized to isometric and isokinetic maximal excitation as well as a hybrid approach currently used in our laboratory. Anterior, middle and posterior deltoid, upper and lower trapezius, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and infraspinatus were monitored during (1) manually resisted MVICs, and (2) maximum voluntary dynamic concentric contractions (MVDC) on an isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic contractions were performed (a) at 30°/s about the longitudinal, frontal and sagittal axes of the shoulder, and (b) during manual bi-rotation of a tilted wheel at 120°/s. EMG from the wheel task was normalized to the maximum excitation from (i) the muscle specific MVIC, (ii) from any MVIC (MVICALL), (iii) for any MVDC, (iv) from any exertion (maximum experimental excitation, MEE). Mean EMG from the wheel task was up to 45% greater when normalized to muscle specific isometric contractions (method i) than when normalized to MEE (method iv). Seventy-five percent of MEE's occurred during MVDCs. This study presents an 20 useful and effective process for obtaining the greatest excitation from the shoulder muscles when normalizing dynamic efforts.

[1]  Kevin Netto,et al.  Examination of EMG normalisation methods for the study of the posterior and posterolateral neck muscles in healthy controls. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  Peter Blanch,et al.  Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Electromyographic activity in the shoulder-neck region according to arm position and glenohumeral torque , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[4]  K P Granata,et al.  Fatigue influences the dynamic stability of the torso , 2008, Ergonomics.

[5]  I. Amiridis,et al.  Co-activation and tension-regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[6]  Heikki Kyröläinen,et al.  Changes in muscle activity with increasing running speed , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  P. V. Komi,et al.  Relationship between Muscle Tension, EMG and Velocity of Contraction under Concentric and Eccentric Work , 1973 .

[8]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  On the feasibility of obtaining multiple muscular maximal voluntary excitation levels from test exertions: a shoulder example. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  M D Grabiner,et al.  Joint angle-dependence of elbow flexor activation levels during isometric and isokinetic maximum voluntary contractions. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  A. Schultz,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of lumbar muscle myoelectric signals during rapid cyclic attempted trunk flexions and extensions. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Angus F Burnett,et al.  Reliability of normalisation methods for EMG analysis of neck muscles. , 2006, Work.

[12]  L. McLean,et al.  Relationship between abdominal and pelvic floor muscle activation and intravaginal pressure during pelvic floor muscle contractions in healthy continent women , 2006, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[13]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Effect of elbow joint angle on force-EMG relationships in human elbow flexor and extensor muscles. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  J. S. Leedham,et al.  Force-length, torque-angle and EMG-joint angle relationships of the human in vivo biceps brachii , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  S. Fischer,et al.  Effect of bilateral versus unilateral exertion tests on maximum voluntary activity and within-participant reproducibility in the shoulder. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  E. Delagi,et al.  Anatomical guide for the electromyographer : the limbs and trunk /by Edward F. Delagi [et al.] ; illustrated by Phyllis B. Hammond, Aldo O. Perotto, and Hugh Thomas , 2005 .

[18]  Kenneth J. Faber,et al.  Serratus Anterior Muscle Activity During Selected Rehabilitation Exercises , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Motoki Kouzaki,et al.  Differences among lower leg muscles in long-term activity during ambulatory condition without any moderate to high intensity exercise. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Normalisation of EMG amplitude: an evaluation and comparison of old and new methods. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  G M Hägg,et al.  Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - A review. , 1995, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  V. Baltzopoulos,et al.  Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  K Ohlsson,et al.  Interindividual variation of physical load in a work task. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[24]  David G. Behm,et al.  Training Adaptations Associated With an 8-Week Instability Resistance Training Program With Recreationally Active Individuals , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  R. Buschbacher Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk , 2007 .

[26]  J Perry,et al.  An EMG analysis of the shoulder in pitching , 1984, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  A D Morris,et al.  A study of the reproducibility of three different normalisation methods in intramuscular dual fine wire electromyography of the shoulder. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[28]  J. Mogk,et al.  The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping , 2003, Ergonomics.

[29]  C. Hautier,et al.  EMG normalization to study muscle activation in cycling. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[30]  S. McGill,et al.  Relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and trunk EMG. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[31]  I. Cathers,et al.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  A. Arampatzis,et al.  Influence of leg stiffness and its effect on myodynamic jumping performance. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[33]  J P Clarys,et al.  Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities , 2000, Ergonomics.

[34]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[35]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  D. Kirkendall,et al.  Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: An electromyographic study , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[37]  S M McGill,et al.  The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[38]  J Harlaar,et al.  Evaluation of moment-angle curves in isokinetic knee extension. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  Timothy D Noakes,et al.  Electromyographic (EMG) normalization method for cycle fatigue protocols. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[40]  C. Anders,et al.  Activation characteristics of shoulder muscles during maximal and submaximal efforts , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[41]  Joanne N. Hodder,et al.  Targeted gripping reduces shoulder muscle activity and variability. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[42]  J Scurr,et al.  An assessment of the reliability and standardisation of tests used to elicit reference muscular actions for electromyographical normalisation. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[43]  E Kellis,et al.  The effects of normalization method on antagonistic activity patterns during eccentric and concentric isokinetic knee extension and flexion. , 1996, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.