Prospective Design Delineation and Subsequent In Vitro Evaluation of a New Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System

Study Design. Finite element and in vitro study. Objective. Finite element calculations to delineate a dynamic fixator and confirmation with an in vitro experiment. Summary and Background Data. In the last few years, there was a paradigm shift from rigid to dynamic fixation of spinal segments. However, some so-called dynamic implants like the Dynesys performed still stiffer than anticipated. The aim of this study was to optimize a dynamic stabilization system. Methods. The development steps of this implant design can be summarized in a development loop. First, a finite element model of an intact human L4–L5 segment was used to delineate implant stiffness parameters for the implant, in consideration of clinical concerns and safety aspects. These data were used in a second step, leading to the final implant design. This development process was completed with an appropriate in vitro experiment. The optimal axial and bending stiffness were computed to reduce the spinal motion by 30%. For the validation process, in vitro tests were performed on 6 human lumbar spinal segments L2–L3 with a median age of 52. The model and the specimens were loaded with pure unconstrained moments of 7.5 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results. This study demonstrated the advantages of employing a finite element model for the implant parameter delineation. It was possible to prospectively outline the needed stiffness parameters for a desired spinal range of motion achievement. Conclusion. In summary, FEM may accelerate the development and the realization of a new implant design.

[1]  H. An,et al.  The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[2]  J. Schlegel,et al.  Lumbar Motion Segment Pathology Adjacent to Thoracolumbar, Lumbar, and Lumbosacral Fusions , 1996, Spine.

[3]  L. Claes,et al.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[4]  L. Claes,et al.  Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[5]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Whole Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacral Joint , 1989, Spine.

[6]  B. Cunningham,et al.  The Effect of Spinal Destabilization and Instrumentation on Lumbar Intradiscal Pressure: An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis , 1997, Spine.

[7]  M. Krismer,et al.  Motion in Lumbar Functional Spine Units During Side Bending and Axial Rotation Moments Depending on the Degree of Degeneration , 2000, Spine.

[8]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  A Plamondon,et al.  Application of a Stereoradiographic Method for the Study of Intervertebral Motion , 1988, Spine.

[10]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[12]  G B Andersson,et al.  The Effect of Disc Degeneration and Facet Joint Osteoarthritis on the Segmental Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 2000, Spine.

[13]  V M Haughton,et al.  The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[14]  L. Claes,et al.  The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase vertebral translation and intradiscal pressure. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  L. Claes,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure, Shear Strain, and Fiber Strain in the Intervertebral Disc Under Combined Loading , 2007, Spine.

[19]  L. Claes,et al.  Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[20]  L Claes,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[22]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Disc Degeneration Affects the Multidirectional Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 1994, Spine.