Use of Warnings in an Attentionally Demanding Detection Task

The study assessed the use of binary warnings in a detection task with high attentional demands. Participants in the experiment had to decide whether to continue or halt production based on a briefly displayed number that indicated a temperature level. The short time that the number was displayed required that participants focus on the display area. Participants were rewarded for production when the system was intact and were heavily penalized for decisions to produce under dangerous temperature levels. Color-coded warning cues (green for safe, red for danger) were displayed to the participants prior to number presentation. The experimental conditions differed in the validity of the cue and in the probability of red cues. Results showed significant learning for all conditions. Participants tended to ignore the nonvalid and low-validity cues and rely only on highly valid cues. However, the mere existence of cues affected participants' general tendency to take risks. Actual or potential applications of this research include improving systems that require operators to devote attention to complex tasks while receiving and responding to warnings.

[1]  Graham A. Murrell,et al.  Combination of evidence in a probabilistic visual search and detection task , 1977 .

[2]  Robert D. Sorkin,et al.  Observer Sensitivity to Element Reliability in a Multielement Visual Display , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[4]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Effects of Warning Validity and Proximity on Responses to Warnings , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  L J Skitka,et al.  Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. , 1997, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[8]  John A. Swets,et al.  System operator response to warnings of danger: A laboratory investigation of the effects of the predictive value of a warning on human response time. , 1995 .

[9]  David D. Woods,et al.  Systems with Human Monitors: A Signal Detection Analysis , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  A Two-Detector Signal Detection Analysis of Learning to Use Alarms , 1997 .

[11]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II , 1985 .

[12]  S. Breznitz Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms , 1984 .

[13]  Robert D. Sorkin,et al.  FORUM: Why are people turning off our alarms? , 1988 .

[14]  Demaris A. Montgomery,et al.  Human Sensitivity to Variability Information in Detection Decisions , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[16]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .