StaTube: facilitating state management in instant messaging systems

Instant messaging systems, such as Skype, offer text, audio and video channels for one-on-one and group conversations, both for personal and professional communication. They are commonly used at a distance, i.e., across countries and continents. To avoid disrupting other tasks, they display personal states to signal others when to contact someone and when not. This mechanism, however, heavily relies on users setting their own state correctly. In an online survey with 46 participants we found that neglecting state updates leads to unwanted messages, either because the state is incorrect or others disrespect it because they assume it to be wrong anyway. We address this situation with the StaTube, a tangible object offering (1) peripheral interaction for setting one's own state and (2) peripheral awareness of selected others' state. In an in-situ evaluation we found first indicators that (1) peripheral interaction fosters more frequent state updates and more accurate state information, and (2) that our participants felt more aware of their contacts' states due to the physical ambient representation.

[1]  J. Mackiewicz,et al.  A Case Study of Coherence in Workplace Instant Messaging , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[2]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance , 2000 .

[3]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace , 2002, CSCW '02.

[4]  Jaroslav Tyman,et al.  Intuitive visualizations for presence and recency information for ambient displays , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  James N. Danziger,et al.  IM = Interruption Management? Instant Messaging and Disruption in the Workplace , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  D. Scott McCrickard,et al.  Enlightening a co-located community with a semi-public notification system , 2006, CSCW '06.

[7]  Jane Webster,et al.  Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies , 2011, CHI.

[9]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Distributed Awareness for Class Orchestration , 2009, EC-TEL.

[10]  Nadya Peek,et al.  Hangsters: tangible peripheral interactive avatars for instant messaging , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[11]  Darren Edge,et al.  Tangible user interfaces for peripheral interaction , 2008 .

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[13]  David V. Keyson,et al.  SnowGlobe: the development of a prototype awareness system for longitudinal field studies , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[14]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[15]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Supporting Coherence with a 3D Instant Messenger Visualization , 2002 .

[16]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace , 2002, CHI.

[17]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Using digital but physical surrogates to mediate awareness, communication and privacy in media spaces , 1999, Personal Technologies.

[18]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies , 2006, BELIV '06.

[19]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[20]  Han Li,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Instant Messaging (IM) on User Performance and Perceived Workload , 2008 .

[21]  Suhong Li,et al.  Social Influence and Instant Messaging Adoption , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[22]  John T. Stasko,et al.  A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design , 2006, AVI '06.