Rate of change in aortic valve area during a cardiac cycle can predict the rate of hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND The ability to predict the rate of hemodynamic progression in an individual patient with valvular aortic stenosis has been elusive. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the rate of change in aortic valve area (AVA) measured during the ejection phase of a cardiac cycle predicts the rate of hemodynamic progression in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS In 84 adults with initially asymptomatic aortic stenosis and a baseline AVA of > or =0.9 cm(2), annual echocardiographic data were obtained prospectively (mean follow-up 2.8+/-1.3 years). With the initial echocardiogram, the ratio of AVA measured at mid-acceleration and mid-deceleration to the AVA at peak velocity was calculated. The primary outcome variable was the annual rate of change in AVA (rate of progression), with rate of progression classified as rapid (a reduction in AVA of > or =0.2 cm(2)/y) or slow (<0.2 cm(2)/y). Rapid progression was significantly associated with an AVA ratio of > or =1.25 (P=0.004, risk ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 7.9). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of AVA ratio of > or =1.25 for the prediction o rapid progression of valvar aortic stenosis was 64%, 72%, and 80% respectively. The decrease in ejection fraction measured from the initial to final echocardiogram was small but greater for patients with an AVA ratio of > or =1.25 (-4+/-7% versus +2+/-7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS A flow-dependent change in AVA can be measured during a routine transthoracic echocardiographic study. The rate of change in AVA is an additional measure of disease severity and may be used to predict an individual's risk for subsequent rapid disease progression.

[1]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  A. Weyman Principles and Practice of Echocardiography , 1994 .

[3]  C. Yancy,et al.  Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  T. Lloyd Variation in Doppler-derived stenotic aortic valve area during ejection. , 1992, American heart journal.

[5]  L. Badano,et al.  Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  C M Otto,et al.  Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  C. Rusconi,et al.  Rate of progression of valvular aortic stenosis in adults. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  S. Davies,et al.  Progression of aortic stenosis. Role of age and concomitant coronary artery disease. , 1994, Chest.

[9]  N. Pandian,et al.  Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Clinical evaluation of left heart Doppler contrast enhancement by a saccharide-based transpulmonary contrast agent. The Levovist Cardiac Working Group. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[12]  J. Seward,et al.  Progression of aortic stenosis in adults: new appraisal using Doppler echocardiography. , 1990, American heart journal.

[13]  C. Otto,et al.  Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.