Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire
暂无分享,去创建一个
Carol Tenopir | Kenneth J. Levine | Rachel Volentine | M. HamidR.Jamali | Reid Boehm | Anthony Watkinson | David Nicholas | Eti Herman | Suzie Allard | Lisa Christian | Frances Nichols | C. Tenopir | Suzie Allard | D. Nicholas | Hamid R. Jamali | Suzie L. Allard | K. Levine | Eti Herman | Rachel Volentine | A. Watkinson | Reid Boehm | Lisa Christian | F. Nichols
[1] Soo Young Rieh,et al. Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] Dario Taraborelli,et al. Soft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation , 2008, COOP.
[3] Bryna Coonin. Open Access Publishing in Business Research: The Authors’ Perspective , 2011 .
[4] Morten Hertzum,et al. Trust in information sources: seeking information from people, documents, and virtual agents , 2002, Interact. Comput..
[5] M. Gad-el-Hak M. Grody W. McKelvey B. Trimble Sw. Bauerlein,et al. We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research , 2010 .
[6] Norman L. Chervany,et al. What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..
[7] Susan Wiedenbeck,et al. On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[8] S. Rajasekaran. Publish to flourish , 2012 .
[9] Bo-Christer Björk,et al. A study of open access journals using article processing charges , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] G. Loewenstein,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.
[11] David Nicholas. Trust and authority in scholarly communications , 2013 .
[12] Nicholas H. Steneck,et al. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions , 2006, Science and Engineering Ethics.
[13] D. Fanelli. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data , 2009, PloS one.
[14] Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al. Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science? , 2008 .
[15] Richard Van Noorden. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions , 2011, Nature.
[16] J. Bohannon. Who's afraid of peer review? , 2013, Science.
[17] Pat Gannon-Leary,et al. The onus on us? Stage one in developing an i-Trust model for our users. , 2012 .
[18] Li-Shia Huang,et al. The Influence of Reading Motives on the Responses after Reading Blogs , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..
[19] Ian Rowlands,et al. Social media use in the research workflow , 2011, Inf. Serv. Use.
[20] Carlo Batini,et al. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques (Data-Centric Systems and Applications) , 2006 .
[21] Barbara D. Klein. User Perceptions of Data Quality: Internet and Traditional Text Sources , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..
[22] Pat Gannon-Leary,et al. Trust in 'E': Users' Trust in Information Resources in the Web Environment , 2010, CENTERIS.
[23] Miriam J. Metzger,et al. Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .
[24] Eti Herman,et al. The information enfranchisement of the digital consumer , 2010, Aslib Proc..
[25] Gilad Mishne,et al. Finding high-quality content in social media , 2008, WSDM '08.
[26] J. H. Davis,et al. An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .
[27] Suzie Allard,et al. Perceived value of scholarly articles , 2011, Learn. Publ..
[28] C. Oppenheim,et al. Authors’ Awareness and Attitudes Toward Open Access Repositories , 2010 .
[29] Jenny Fry,et al. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..
[30] Craig W. Fisher,et al. Introduction to Information Quality , 2006 .
[31] A. Casadevall,et al. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index , 2011, Infection and Immunity.
[32] Shirlee-ann Knight,et al. User perceptions of information quality in world wide web information retrieval behaviour , 2007 .
[33] A. Pickard,et al. Users' trust in information resources in the Web environment: a status report , 2010 .
[34] Stefanie E Warlick,et al. Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access , 2007, Biomedical Digital Libraries.
[35] Jeffrey Beall,et al. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access , 2012, Nature.
[36] Jeffrey Beall,et al. Unethical Practices in Scholarly, Open-Access Publishing , 2013 .
[37] Carol Tenopir,et al. Social media and scholarly reading , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..
[38] Suzie Allard,et al. Research Publication Characteristics and Their Relative Values: A , 2010 .
[39] Ewald A. Kaluscha,et al. Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[40] L. Zirulia,et al. The Economics of Scientific Misconduct , 2008 .
[41] Carol Tenopir,et al. How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences , 2014 .
[42] Suzie Allard,et al. Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study , 2014, Learn. Publ..
[43] Lucy Carter,et al. A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[44] Logan Wilson,et al. The Academic Man: A Study in the Sociology of a Profession , 1995 .
[45] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. Scientists behaving badly , 2005, Nature.
[46] Tharam S. Dillon,et al. Content Quality Assessment Related Frameworks for Social Media , 2009, ICCSA.
[47] R. David Lankes,et al. Credibility on the internet: shifting from authority to reliability , 2008, J. Documentation.
[48] Michael Moss,et al. Is it a question of trust or why are we afraid to go to Nineveh? , 2011 .
[49] Jennifer E. Rowley,et al. Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..
[50] Peter Williams,et al. Google Generation II: web behaviour experiments with the BBC , 2011, Aslib Proc..
[51] Carol Tenopir,et al. Scholarly Reading by Faculty in the United States: Summary Results of a Study Conducted in 2012 in Five Universities , 2013 .
[52] Rob Procter,et al. If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0 , 2010 .
[53] M. Nedeva,et al. Rank and File: Managing Individual Performance in University Research , 2012 .
[54] Carlo Batini,et al. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques , 2006, Data-Centric Systems and Applications.
[55] Peter Igo-Kemenes,et al. Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing , 2011, ArXiv.
[56] Rob Procter,et al. If you build it, will they come? : how researchers perceive and use web 2.0 : a Research Information Network report , 2010 .
[57] William A. Wallace,et al. Trust in digital information , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[58] R VanNoorden. THE TROUBLE WITH RETRACTIONS , 2011 .
[59] Thomas Arrison,et al. FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH , 2017 .