Simulation of the normal concentric needle electromyogram by using a muscle model

OBJECTIVES To study the correlation between anatomical parameters and EMG signals by means of simulations. METHODS A mathematical model of the electrical activity from muscle fibres and motor units has been developed. The electrical fields around the muscle fibres are simulated using a line source model. The model permits the simulation of single muscle fibre action potentials obtained by SFEMG, concentric and Macro EMG electrodes. By using appropriate anatomical parameters EMG recordings with these electrodes can be simulated. The model is flexible and permits a number of anatomical parameters to be changed such as; number of muscle fibres in a motor unit, fibre diameter distribution, and motor end-plate geometry. Some physiological parameters can be optionally varied; firing rate, threshold for recruitment, jitter. RESULTS In this study, simulations of CNEMG are performed and the influence of a number of parameters on the CNEMG signal is studied. It is shown that the model produces motor unit potentials reasonably well resembling those from live recordings. More important is however the relative change in MUP parameters when certain conditions are changed; number of muscle fibres in a motor unit, recording position, muscle fibre diameters and some special effects of the recording conditions. CONCLUSIONS The simulated muscle and corresponding EMG recording can be used both as a research tool and for teaching.

[1]  E. Stålberg,et al.  Can the size principle be detected in conventional emg recordings? , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  E Stålberg,et al.  Influence of recording site withing the muscle on motor unit potentials , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  E Stålberg,et al.  Quantitative motor unit potential analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[5]  A. Woolf,et al.  The innervation of muscle : a biopsy study , 1959 .

[6]  E Stålberg,et al.  The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: analysis of the MUP "thickness" and the proposal of "size index". , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  E Stålberg,et al.  Scanning EMG in normal muscle and in neuromuscular disorders. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Erik Stålberg,et al.  Multi-MUP EMG analysis - a two year experience with a quantitative method in daily routine. , 1995 .

[9]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  E Stålberg,et al.  Multi-MUP EMG analysis--a two year experience in daily clinical work. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.