Research Paper: Data Quality of General Practice Electronic Health Records: The Impact of a Program of Assessments, Feedback, and Training

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a program of repeated assessments, feedback, and training on the quality of coded clinical data in general practice. DESIGN A prospective uncontrolled intervention study was conducted in a general practice research network. MEASUREMENTS Percentage of recorded consultations with a coded problem title and percentage of patients receiving a specific drug (e.g., tamoxifen) who had the relevant morbidity code (e.g., breast cancer) were calculated. Annual period prevalence of 12 selected morbidities was compared with parallel data derived from the fourth National Study of Morbidity Statistics from General Practice (MSGP4). RESULTS The first two measures showed variation between practices at baseline, but on repeat assessments all practices improved or maintained their levels of coding. The period prevalence figures also were variable, but over time rates increased to levels comparable with, or above, MSGP4 rates. Practices were able to provide time and resources for feedback and training sessions. CONCLUSION A program of repeated assessments, feedback, and training appears to improve data quality in a range of practices. The program is likely to be generalizable to other practices but needs a trained support team to implement it that has implications for cost and resources.

[1]  A Gilliland,et al.  General practitioner records on computer--handle with care. , 1992, Family practice.

[2]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Have the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in general practice improved in the last five years? The report of a two-practice pilot study , 1999 .

[3]  Denis J. Protti,et al.  A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005) , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  M Pringle,et al.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  Huw Thomas,et al.  Collecting morbidity data in general practice: the Somerset morbidity project , 1996, BMJ.

[7]  J. Chisholm,et al.  The Read clinical classification. , 1990, BMJ.

[8]  David Gerrett,et al.  A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  A Bottomley,et al.  Methodology for assessing the prevalence of angina in primary care using practice based information in northern England. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  S Scobie,et al.  Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? , 1995, Journal of public health medicine.

[11]  D Mant,et al.  Completeness of chronic disease registration in general practice. , 1987, British medical journal.

[12]  J. Hollowell,et al.  The General Practice Research Database: quality of morbidity data. , 1997, Population trends.

[13]  A Coulter,et al.  Computer held chronic disease registers in general practice: a validation study. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  SIMON DE LUSIGNAN,et al.  Research Paper: Does Feedback Improve the Quality of Computerized Medical Records in Primary Care? , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..