Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms

Abstract In present work, a design by optimization of contracted and tip-loaded (CLT) propellers is proposed and implemented. The design approach is based on a parametric description of the propeller blade, derived from the usual design table by using B-Spline parametric curves, and an in-house developed Panel Method/Boundary Element Method (BEM) aimed to evaluate the performance (including cavitation) of the propellers selected by a genetic optimization algorithm. The modeFRONTIER optimization environment drives the entire design process. A preliminary sensitivity study is carried out to evaluate the effect of the discretization meshes for BEM and RANSE calculations. Based on this analysis, Boundary Element Method and RANSE results over the parent propeller, in terms of both open water propeller performance, unsteady cavitation and induced pressure pulses, are compared with the available experimental measurements in order to validate the adopted design approach. Finally, to assess the reliability of the design by optimization, a set of optimized geometries, selected on the basis of the fulfillment of the design objectives, are checked by means of dedicated RANSE calculations.

[1]  Stefano Gaggero,et al.  Comparison of different scaling methods for model tests with CLT propellers , 2014 .

[2]  Cesare Mario Rizzo,et al.  EFD and CFD Design and Analysis of a Propeller in Decelerating Duct , 2012 .

[3]  Jill Carlton,et al.  Marine Propellers and Propulsion , 2007 .

[4]  S. Kinnas,et al.  A boundary element method for the analysis of the flow around 3-D cavitating hydrofoils , 1993 .

[5]  Antonio Sanchez Caja,et al.  Simulation of the Incompressible Viscous Flow around an Endplate Propeller Using a RANSE Solver , 2006 .

[6]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  EFD and CFD Characterization of a CLT Propeller , 2012 .

[7]  D. R. Stinebring,et al.  A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction , 2000 .

[8]  L. Morino,et al.  Subsonic Potential Aerodynamics for Complex Configurations: A General Theory , 1974 .

[9]  A. Sánchez-Caja,et al.  Scale effects on tip loaded propeller performance using a RANSE solver , 2014 .

[10]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  Endplate effect propellers: A numerical overview , 2011 .

[11]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  CPP propeller cavitation and noise optimization at different pitches with panel code and validation by cavitation tunnel measurements , 2012 .

[12]  A. K. Singhal,et al.  Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model , 2002 .

[13]  Ching-Yeh Hsin,et al.  Development and analysis of panel methods for propellers in unsteady flow , 1990 .

[14]  Poul Andersen,et al.  Development of a Marine Propeller With Nonplanar Lifting Surfaces , 2005 .

[15]  Mitja Morgut,et al.  Numerical Predictions of Cavitating Flow around Model Scale Propellers by CFD and Advanced Model Calibration , 2012 .

[16]  K Jong,et al.  MODEL TESTING OF AN OPTIMALLY DESIGNED PROPELLER WITH TWO-SIDED SHIFTED END PLATES ON THE BLADES , 1994 .

[17]  Giorgio Tani,et al.  A study on the numerical prediction of propellers cavitating tip vortex , 2014 .

[18]  Spyridon A Kinnas,et al.  Numerical Model of Cavitating Propeller Inside of a Tunnel , 1999 .

[19]  Ja Sparenberg,et al.  ON THE INFLUENCE OF CHOICE OF GENERATOR LINES ON THE OPTIMUM EFFICIENCY OF SCREW PROPELLERS , 1990 .

[20]  S. Kinnas,et al.  Propeller sheet cavitation predictions using a panel method , 1999 .

[21]  Mark Drela,et al.  Viscous flow around marine propellers using boundary layer strip theory , 1994 .

[22]  C. Merkle,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation , 1998 .