Comparison between Shape Memory Alloy Seismic Restrainers and Other Bridge Retrofit Devices

Strong earthquakes can result in large longitudinal displacements in multiple-frame bridges. This could lead to excessive displacements/openings at the intermediate joints. Bridges with small seat widths are vulnerable to the unseating of their superstructure. Seismic steel restrainers are currently used to limit joint openings in bridges. However, past earthquakes have shown that restrainer cables have limitations in regards to preventing unseating in bridges. Other devices have been proposed to limit joint displacements, including metallic dampers, viscoelastic dampers, and shape memory alloys (SMAs), which are known for their ability to recover their original shape after being deformed. A sensitivity and a case study are conducted using computer simulations to compare the effectiveness of SMA retrofit devices with other devices. Results show that the effectiveness of the devices is a function of characteristics of the bridge frames and the ground motion characteristics. In all cases, the steel restrainer cables were the least effective in limiting joint displacements. The SMA devices have the additional benefit of significantly limiting the residual joint displacement in bridges.

[1]  L. Javier Malvar,et al.  BRIDGE RETROFIT TESTING: HINGE CABLE RESTRAINERS , 1989 .

[2]  Anshel J. Schiff,et al.  Northridge earthquake : lifeline performance and post-earthquake response , 1995 .

[3]  E. M. Maragakis,et al.  SEISMIC RESTRAINER DESIGN METHODS FOR SIMPLY SUPPORTED BRIDGES , 2001 .

[4]  Xiao Jun Yan,et al.  TECHNICAL NOTE: Study of a new application form of shape memory alloy superelasticity , 2003 .

[5]  James E. Roberts,et al.  Caltrans structural control for bridges in high‐seismic zones , 2005 .

[6]  Masanori Iiba,et al.  Experimental study on enhancement of self-restoration of concrete beams using SMA wire , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[7]  John F. Stanton,et al.  Design of Seismic Restrainers for In-Span Hinges , 1997 .

[8]  S. Bruno,et al.  Comparative response analysis of conventional and innovative seismic protection strategies , 2002 .

[9]  Genda Chen,et al.  METALLIC DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES , 2001 .

[10]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Seismic design with supplemental energy dissipation devices , 2001 .

[11]  J D Cooper,et al.  THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE: PROGRESS MADE, LESSONS LEARNED IN SEISMIC-RESISTANT BRIDGE DESIGN , 1994 .

[12]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Design of seismic cable hinge restrainers for bridges , 2000 .

[13]  Jack R. Hayes,et al.  Structural damping with shape-memory alloys: one class of devices , 1995, Smart Structures.

[14]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[15]  Perry H Leo,et al.  The use of shape memory alloys for passive structural damping , 1995 .

[16]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Viscoelastic Dampers at Expansion Joints for Seismic Protection of Bridges , 2000 .

[17]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering , 1997 .

[18]  Yoshiyuki Suzuki,et al.  Using NiTi SMA tendons for vibration control of coastal structures , 2001 .

[19]  María Ofelia Moroni,et al.  DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CHILEAN BRIDGES WITH SEISMIC PROTECTION , 2005 .