Development of a methodology for damping of tall buildings motion using TLCD devices

One of the most common solutions adopted to reduce vibrations of skyscrapers due to wind or earthquake action is to add external damping devices to these structures, such as a TMD (Tuned Mass Damper) or TLCD (Tuned Liquid Column Damper). It is well known that a TLCD device introduces on the structure a nonlinear damping force whose effect decreases when the amplitude of its motion increases. The main objective of this paper is to describe a Hardware-in-the-Loop test able to validate the effectiveness of the TLCD by simulating the real behavior of a tower subjected to the combined action of wind and a TLCD, considering also the nonlinear effects associated with the damping device behavior. Within this test procedure a scaled TLCD physical model represents the hardware component while the building dynamics are reproduced using a numerical model based on a modal approach. Thanks to the Politecnico di Milano wind tunnel, wind forces acting on the building were calculated from the pressure distributions measured on a scale model. In addition, in the first part of the paper, a new method for evaluating the dissipating characteristics of a TLCD based on an energy approach is presented. This new methodology allows direct linking of the TLCD to be directly linked to the increased damping acting on the structure, facilitating the preliminary design of these devices.

[1]  Sung-Kyung Lee,et al.  Performance test of a tuned liquid mass damper for reducing bidirectional responses of building structures , 2009 .

[2]  Sung-Kyung Lee,et al.  Parameter identification of new bidirectional tuned liquid column and sloshing dampers , 2011 .

[3]  Sung-Kyung Lee,et al.  Real-time hybrid shaking table testing method for the performance evaluation of a tuned liquid damper controlling seismic response of building structures , 2007 .

[4]  G. Tomasini,et al.  Wind tunnel tests on heavy road vehicles: Cross wind induced loads--Part 1 , 2011 .

[5]  Yung-Hsiang Chen,et al.  Optimal damping ratio of TLCDs , 2000 .

[6]  E. Sabbioni,et al.  Wind tunnel tests on heavy road vehicles: Cross wind induced loads—Part 2 , 2011 .

[7]  G. Tomasini,et al.  Wind tunnel tests on train scale models to investigate the effect of infrastructure scenario , 2010 .

[8]  B. Samali,et al.  Control of Along-Wind Response of Structures by Mass and Liquid Dampers , 1992 .

[9]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Single‐ and multiple‐tuned liquid column dampers for seismic applications , 1998 .

[10]  B. Samali,et al.  Characteristics of multiple tuned liquid column dampers in suppressing structural vibration , 1999 .

[11]  P. Lukkunaprasit,et al.  Simulation of characteristics of tuned liquid column damper using a potential-flow method , 2007 .

[12]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Wind-induced dynamics and loads in a prismatic slender building: A modal approach based on unsteady pressure measurements , 2012 .

[13]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Semi-active tuned liquid column dampers for vibration control of structures , 2001 .

[14]  S. Yalla,et al.  Optimum Absorber Parameters for Tuned Liquid Column Dampers , 2000 .

[15]  Medhat A. Haroun,et al.  STOCHASTIC SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TUNED LIQUID COLUMN DAMPERS , 1996 .

[16]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[17]  K. M. Shum,et al.  Closed form optimal solution of a tuned liquid column damper for suppressing harmonic vibration of structures , 2009 .

[18]  Chien Ming Wang,et al.  Effectiveness of tuned liquid column dampers for vibration control of towers , 1995 .

[19]  Federico Cheli,et al.  Admittance function to evaluate aerodynamic loads on vehicles: Experimental data and numerical model , 2013 .

[20]  Yung-Hsiang Chen,et al.  Active tuned liquid column damper with propellers , 2003 .

[21]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  Optimum design of tuned liquid column dampers under stochastic earthquake load considering uncertain bounded system parameters , 2010 .