论文信息 - Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

A continuously moving object typically is perceived to lead a flashed object in space when the two retinal images are physically aligned, a phenomenon known as the flash-lag effect ([1][1]). Eagleman and Sejnowski ([2][2]) recently published data that they interpreted to disagree with a previous

H. Bedell | H. Ogmen | S. Patel | V. Sampath

[1] W. Metzger,et al. Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[2] D. Mackay. Perceptual Stability of a Stroboscopically Lit Visual Field containing Self-Luminous Objects , 1958, Nature.

[3] R. Efron,et al. Conservation of temporal information by perceptual systems , 1973 .

[4] Leonard Matin,et al. Vernier discrimination with sequentially-flashed lines: Roles of eye movements, retinal offsets and short-term memory , 1981, Vision Research.

[5] S. Mateeff,et al. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[6] Stanley A. Klein,et al. Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[7] I. Murakami,et al. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[8] M. Lappe,et al. The position of moving objects. , 2000, Perception.

[9] Gopathy Purushothaman,et al. Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[10] Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al. An optimal estimation approach to visual perception and learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[11] T J Sejnowski,et al. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[12] P. Cavanagh,et al. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.