Estimating the Impact of Efficiency Standards on the Uncertainty of the Northwest Electric System

The uncertainty of the Northwest electric system was the subject of a recent study for the Bonneville Power Administration. System uncertainty was described along two dimensions over a twenty year planning period. One dimension was uncertainty in the demand for electricity; the second dimension was uncertainty in the price of electricity. The study focused on the impact of efficiency standards that would reduce the electricity used in new buildings and appliances. Many planners expect that the standards would reduce the long-term uncertainty in electricity demand. Some planners have come to realize that the standards could also reduce the long-term uncertainty in the price of electricity. This paper explains the case study approach to estimating the magnitude of these reductions in uncertainty. I describe the analytical approach and the key findings of the study, and conclude with a discussion of the study's impact on decision making in the region.

[1]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Using system dynamics for conservation policy analysis in the Pacific Northwest , 1989 .

[2]  H. Thomas,et al.  Risk analysis and its applications , 1983 .

[3]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  OR Practice - An Analysis of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company's Technology Choice , 1986, Oper. Res..

[4]  George S. Fishman,et al.  Solution of Large Networks by Matrix Methods , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of the IEA/ORAU CO2 Emissions Model , 1987 .

[6]  Andrew Ford,et al.  The Impact of Performance Standards on the Uncertainty of the Pacific Northwest Electric System : Final Report on the HYPERSENS Analysis of CPAM (Conservation Policy Analysis Model). , 1988 .

[7]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[8]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Tolerance Limits for a Normal Distribution , 1946 .

[9]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[10]  E. Brusger,et al.  Multiobjective Integrated Decision Analysis System (MIDAS): Volume 1, Model overview: Final report , 1988 .

[11]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  Multiobjective Decision Analysis for Transmission Conductor Selection , 1978 .

[12]  Derek W. Bunn,et al.  Multiple Perspectives for Decision-Making , 1985 .

[13]  Rakesh K. Sarin Ranking of Multiattribute Alternatives with an Application to Coal Power Plant Siting , 1980 .

[14]  Arun P. Sanghvi,et al.  Least-cost energy strategies for power system expansion☆ , 1984 .

[15]  Y. Ronen Uncertainty Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..

[17]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Adding uncertainty to least-cost planning: A case study of efficiency standards in the Northwest☆ , 1990 .

[18]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Uncertainty in long-term resource planning for electric utilities , 1988 .

[19]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Asymmetry in energy system uncertainty , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[20]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Operational procedures to evaluate decisions with multiple objectives: Final report , 1987 .

[21]  W. Huss,et al.  Scenario planning—What style should you use? , 1987 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Siting energy facilities , 1980 .

[23]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Bonneville's conservation policy analysis models , 1987 .

[24]  A. Ford,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in energy model forecasts , 1985 .