Estimation of Auction Models with Shape Restrictions

We introduce several new estimation methods that leverage shape constraints in auction models to estimate various objects of interest, including the distribution of a bidder's valuations, the bidder's ex ante expected surplus, and the seller's counterfactual revenue. The basic approach applies broadly in that (unlike most of the literature) it works for a wide range of auction formats and allows for asymmetric bidders. Though our approach is not restrictive, we focus our analysis on first--price, sealed--bid auctions with independent private valuations. We highlight two nonparametric estimation strategies, one based on a least squares criterion and the other on a maximum likelihood criterion. We also provide the first direct estimator of the strategy function. We establish several theoretical properties of our methods to guide empirical analysis and inference. In addition to providing the asymptotic distributions of our estimators, we identify ways in which methodological choices should be tailored to the objects of their interest. For objects like the bidders' ex ante surplus and the seller's counterfactual expected revenue with an additional symmetric bidder, we show that our input--parameter--free estimators achieve the semiparametric efficiency bound. For objects like the bidders' inverse strategy function, we provide an easily implementable boundary--corrected kernel smoothing and transformation method in order to ensure the squared error is integrable over the entire support of the valuations. An extensive simulation study illustrates our analytical results and demonstrates the respective advantages of our least--squares and maximum likelihood estimators in finite samples. Compared to estimation strategies based on kernel density estimation, the simulations indicate that the smoothed versions of our estimators enjoy a large degree of robustness to the choice of an input parameter.

[1]  M. A. Hanson On sufficiency of the Kuhn-Tucker conditions , 1981 .

[2]  Jun Ma,et al.  Inference for first-price auctions with Guerre, Perrigne, and Vuong’s estimator , 2019, Journal of Econometrics.

[3]  Bernard Lebrun,et al.  Uniqueness of the equilibrium in first-price auctions , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  D. Pollard,et al.  Cube Root Asymptotics , 1990 .

[5]  Tong Li,et al.  Entry and Competition Effects in First-Price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Procurement Auctions , 2006 .

[6]  Xiaohong Chen Chapter 76 Large Sample Sieve Estimation of Semi-Nonparametric Models , 2007 .

[7]  Tong Li,et al.  Identification in Auctions with Selective Entry , 2012 .

[8]  Quang Vuong,et al.  Nonparametric Identification of Risk Aversion in First‐Price Auctions Under Exclusion Restrictions , 2009 .

[9]  Bradley Larsen,et al.  A Mechanism Design Approach to Identification and Estimation , 2018 .

[10]  H. D. Brunk Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Monotone Parameters , 1955 .

[11]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[12]  James W. Roberts,et al.  Unobserved Heterogeneity and Reserve Prices in Auctions , 2009 .

[13]  Dan Levin,et al.  Equilibrium in Auctions with Entry , 1994 .

[14]  Susan Athey,et al.  Identification of Standard Auction Models , 2000 .

[15]  Gautam Tripathi,et al.  LOCAL SEMIPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY BOUNDS UNDER SHAPE RESTRICTIONS , 2000, Econometric Theory.

[16]  W. Newey,et al.  Semiparametric Efficiency Bounds , 1990 .

[17]  E. Guerre,et al.  Quantile regression methods for first-price auctions , 2019, Journal of Econometrics.

[18]  H. Bierens,et al.  Semi-nonparametric estimation of independently and identically repeated first-price auctions via an integrated simulated moments method , 2012 .

[19]  Quang Vuong,et al.  Asymmetry in first-price auctions with affiliated private values , 2003 .

[20]  Rohana J. Karunamuni,et al.  On boundary correction in kernel density estimation , 2005 .

[21]  P. Robinson ROOT-N-CONSISTENT SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION , 1988 .

[22]  Pai Xu,et al.  What Model for Entry in First-Price Auctions? A Nonparametric Approach , 2010 .

[23]  Classical Laplace estimation for n3-consistent estimators: Improved convergence rates and rate-adaptive inference , 2015 .

[24]  Yuanyuan Wan,et al.  Integrated-Quantile-Based Estimation for First-Price Auction Models , 2018 .

[25]  An Information – Theoretic Approach to Partially Identified Auction Models , 2017 .

[26]  Rohana J. Karunamuni,et al.  Some improvements on a boundary corrected kernel density estimator , 2008 .

[27]  R. Dykstra,et al.  Marginal Densities of the Least Concave Majorant of Brownian Motion , 2001 .

[28]  M. A. Hanson Invexity and the Kuhn–Tucker Theorem☆ , 1999 .

[29]  Jun Ma,et al.  Monotonicity-constrained nonparametric estimation and inference for first-price auctions , 2019, Econometric Reviews.

[30]  Thomas M. Stoker,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation of Index Coefficients , 1989 .

[31]  E. Krasnokutskaya,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Auction Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[32]  John A. List,et al.  Empirical Implementation of Nonparametric First-Price Auction Models , 2011 .

[33]  Artyom Shneyerov,et al.  Quantile-Based Nonparametric Inference for First-Price Auctions , 2009 .

[34]  E. Maskin,et al.  Equilibrium in Sealed High Bid Auctions , 2000 .

[35]  Brent Richard Hickman,et al.  Replacing Sample Trimming with Boundary Correction in Nonparametric Estimation of First‐Price Auctions , 2015 .

[36]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Optimal Nonparametric Estimation of First-price Auctions , 2000 .

[37]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..