Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science

There is scant research-based evidence regarding what the public is interested in knowing about science, and more knowledge is needed to tailor relevant and engaging formal and free-choice science environments for different publics. This methodological paper describes the potential and limitations of three existing web-based tools — Google Trends, Google Zeitgeist, and Google Insights for Search — for PUS research. It shows how these tools can be used to (1) identify interests in science and pseudoscience, (2) conduct a cross-national comparison of popular science and pseudoscience-related searches and (3) discover possible motivations when searching for specific terms. Trends identified using analyses of online queries are discussed. These provide a bottom-up assessment of PUS, and may add another argument to the controversy regarding quantitative measures and the deficit model.

[1]  E. Deci.  The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. , 1992 .

[2]  Denis McQuail,et al.  Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest , 1992 .

[3]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[4]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election , 1998 .

[5]  E. W. Jenkins,et al.  School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science , 1999 .

[6]  Andreas Krapp,et al.  5 – Interest and Human Development During Adolescence: An Educational-Psychological Approach , 2000 .

[7]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[8]  Jon D. Miller.  Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2004 .

[9]  Young people and science , 2004 .

[10]  Anat Yarden,et al.  Characterizing children’s spontaneous interests in science and technology , 2005 .

[11]  J. Schummer.  Reading nano: the public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in purchase patterns of books , 2005 .

[12]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  Towards the Detection of Breaking News from Online Web Search Keywords , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops.

[13]  Jörg Rech,et al.  Discovering trends in software engineering with google trend , 2007, SOEN.

[14]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda , 2007 .

[15]  P. Csermely,et al.  A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe , 2007 .

[16]  S. Caravita,et al.  What do laypersons want to know from scientists? An analysis of a dialogue between scientists and laypersons on the web site Scienzaonline , 2007 .

[17]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[18]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic—survey research divide , 2007 .

[19]  J. Osborne,et al.  Science education in Europe , 2008 .

[20]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Using Data Mining to Predict K-12 Students' Performance on Large-Scale Assessment Items Related to Energy. , 2008 .

[21]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[22]  Ricky J. Sethi,et al.  Asking scientists: A decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country , 2009 .

[23]  H. Varian,et al.  Predicting the Present with Google Trends , 2009 .

[24]  A. Baram‐Tsabari,et al.  Identifying meta‐clusters of students' interest in science and their change with age , 2009 .

[25]  Elad Segev,et al.  Popular Searches in Google and Yahoo!: A “Digital Divide” in Information Uses? , 2010, Inf. Soc..