Market power monitoring and mitigation in the US wholesale power markets

Under current statutory requirements, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) must ensure that prices in US wholesale power markets are ‘just and reasonable’. This has been interpreted by the agency and the courts as requiring the monitoring and mitigation of undue market power. This paper focuses on generation market power. Prior to electricity sector restructuring, wholesale bilateral power trading took place among vertically integrated monopoly utilities trading at the margin or between small independent producers and the utilities. Under those conditions, the authorization of trading at market prices, called ‘market-based rates’, required only that the generation supplier pass a simple market share screen for market power. As restructuring unfolded, and market conditions changed, there has been a steady evolution in FERC's market power mitigation rules, encompassing (a) changes in the market power assessment required for granting market-based rates and related methods for merger approval, and (b) development and refinement of new techniques for screening and mitigating offers into the organized day-ahead and real-time markets operated by Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). This paper reviews these changes to date, as FERC continues to clarify its approved rules and procedures. It also examines recent methods for quantitative market power analysis that could augment current procedures or supplant them, as found appropriate.

[1]  James Bushnell,et al.  Transmission Rights and Market Power , 1999 .

[2]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Power Markets on a Linearized DC Network with Arbitrage: Formulations and Properties , 2003 .

[3]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  Horizontal Mergers and Antitrust Policy , 1992 .

[4]  William W. Hogan,et al.  ON THE EXERCISE OF MARKET POWER THROUGH STRATEGIC WITHHOLDING IN CALIFORNIA , 2001 .

[5]  Bert Willems,et al.  Modeling Cournot Competition in an Electricity Market with Transmission Constraints , 2002 .

[6]  P. Healy,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 2—Spring 2003—Pages 3–26 The Fall of Enron , 2022 .

[7]  James Bushnell A Mixed Complementarity Model of Hydro-Thermal Competition in the Western U.S , 2003 .

[8]  J. Cardell Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks , 1997 .

[9]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[10]  R. Baldick Electricity Market Equilibrium Models: The Effect of Parameterization , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Horizontal Mergers: Reply , 1991 .

[12]  J. Pang,et al.  Oligopolistic Competition in Power Networks: A Conjectured Supply Function Approach , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[13]  Walter Surratt The Analytical Approach to Measuring Horizontal Market Power in Electric Utility Markets: A Historical Perspective , 1998 .

[14]  M. L. Baughman,et al.  An Empirical Study of Applied Game Theory: Transmission Constrained Cournot Behavior , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[15]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  J. Bushnell,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market , 2002 .

[17]  Joseph C. Schuh,et al.  Markets, pricing, and deregulation of utilities , 2003 .

[18]  Horizontal mergers: Law, policy, and economics , 1993 .

[19]  James Bushnell,et al.  Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured U.S. Electricity Markets , 2005 .

[20]  Catherine D. Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1999 .

[21]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach , 1999 .

[22]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[23]  Frank A. Wolak,et al.  Diagnosing the California Electricity Crisis , 2003 .

[24]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Horizontal Mergers: An Equilibrium Analysis , 1988 .

[25]  James Bushnell,et al.  Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures , 1999 .

[26]  Robert B. Wilson,et al.  Research Paper Series Graduate School of Business Stanford University Architecture of Power Markets Architecture of Power Markets 1 , 2022 .

[27]  M. Rothkopf,et al.  Evaluation of a Truthful Revelation Auction in the Context of Energy Markets with Nonconcave Benefits , 2000 .

[28]  Robert Entriken,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation of an Automatic Mitigation Procedure , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Estimating Effective Concentration in Deregulated Wholesale Electricity Markets , 1984 .

[30]  Frank A. Wolak,et al.  Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market, 1998-2000 , 2003 .

[31]  S. Salant,et al.  Losses From Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Cournot-Nash Equilibrium , 1983 .

[32]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details , 2005 .

[33]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Linear Complementarity Models of Nash-Cournot Competition in Bilateral and POOLCO Power Markets , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[34]  John L. Jurewitz California's Electricity Debacle: A Guided Tour , 2002 .

[35]  William W. Hogan,et al.  A Market Power Model with Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks , 1997 .

[36]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Spatial Oligopolistic Electricity Models with Cournot Generators and Regulated Transmission Prices , 1999, Oper. Res..

[37]  J. Tirole,et al.  Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks , 1999 .

[38]  F. Wolak An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market , 2000 .

[39]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Network Models of Spatial Oligopoly with an Application to Deregulation of Electricity Generation , 1986, Oper. Res..

[40]  G. Werden Horizontal Mergers: Comment , 1991 .

[41]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market , 2002 .

[42]  A.F. Wals,et al.  Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system-part II: application , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[43]  E. Kahn,et al.  A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000 , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[44]  Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct , 2003 .

[45]  S. Borenstein The Trouble With Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster , 2002 .