Lower visual acuity predicts worse utility values among patients with type 2 diabetes

ObjectiveWe estimated the quality of life impact of vision loss in a community-based population with diabetes.Design and methodsWe randomly surveyed 4,000 members of a large health maintenance organization with type 2 diabetes to assess quality of life using the EQ-5D instrument. Visual acuity was obtained by automated text processing of clinical notes recorded during the two years preceding subjects’ surveys. Natural language processing was used to collect data from electronic medical records and to read clinical notes to determine the stage of retinopathy. Linear regression was used to model quality of life scores.ResultsOf the 4,000 surveys sent, approximately 55% of patients responded. Patients with ≥20/20 acuity reported the highest mean utility (mean = 0.82), which declined as the visual angle doubled to 20/40 (mean = 0.75), and then doubled again to ≤20/80 (mean = 0.71). Perfect utility (1.0) was reported by 28% of the sample. Only 7% of patients suffered visual impairment (≤20/40), and lower levels of visual acuity rarely occurred. Compared with patients with ≥20/20 acuity, the first doubling of the visual angle (20/40) lowered utility by three points (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.05 to −0.01), and the second doubling of the visual angle (≤20/80) lowered utility by six points (95%CI, −0.10 to −0.02).ConclusionsThis study aimed to estimate disutility associated with visual loss in patients with diabetes using a community-based sample and controlled for many characteristics associated with quality of life. We found a smaller utility decrement compared to other studies, suggesting that visual acuity’s impact on the quality of life for patients with diabetes in the community setting differs from more selected populations.

[1]  G. Brown,et al.  Utility values and age-related macular degeneration. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Greenlick,et al.  Health care research in an HMO : two decades of discovery , 1988 .

[3]  T. Cvetković,et al.  Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2014 .

[4]  A. Bagust,et al.  Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data. , 2005, Health economics.

[5]  M. Engelgau,et al.  Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[6]  Per Kragh Andersen,et al.  Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edn. Kenneth J. Rothman and Sander Greenland, Lippincott‐Raven, U.S.A., 1998. No. of pages: 737. Price: $74.50. ISBN 0‐316‐75780‐2 , 2000 .

[7]  D L DeMets,et al.  The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  G. Brown,et al.  Converting visual acuity to utilities. , 2000, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[9]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Application of Information Technology j MediClass : A System for Detecting and Classifying Encounter-based Clinical Events in Any Electronic Medical , 2005 .

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  The impact of diabetic retinopathy: perspectives from patient focus groups. , 2004, Family practice.

[12]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[14]  D L DeMets,et al.  The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. VI. Retinal photocoagulation. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[15]  N. Congdon,et al.  Important causes of visual impairment in the world today. , 2003, JAMA.

[16]  R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[17]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[18]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[19]  G. Nichols,et al.  Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes care. , 2000, The Western journal of medicine.

[20]  Alastair Gray,et al.  Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62) , 2002, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.