Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity

Abstract Knowledge, as resource, and technological innovation, as a dynamic capability, are key sources for firm's sustained competitive advantage and survival in knowledge-based and high-tech industries. Under this rationale has emerged a research stream where knowledge management, organizational learning, or intellectual capital, help to understand and constitute the key pieces of one of the most complex business phenomena; the ‘firm's technological advantage’. This being so, it is also true that in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets, competitive success comes directly from continuous technological innovations, where a single organization cannot successfully innovate in isolation; therefore, firms should rely on external relationships and networks in order to complement its knowledge domains, and then, develop better and faster innovations. In this sense, I would like to highlight the cross-fertilizing role of three constructs that are nurtured by different research traditions: ‘collaborative/open innovation’, from Strategy and Innovation Management research; ‘absorptive capacity’, from ‘A Knowledge-Based View’; and ‘market orientation’, from Marketing research.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[3]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  Ru-Jen Lin,et al.  Turning Knowledge Management into Innovation in the High-Tech Industry , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[6]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field , 2004 .

[7]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[8]  Jeffrey P. Wallman.  Fields of opportunity: How marketers design the transaction game with transaction field maps , 2014 .

[9]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms , 2010 .

[10]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  The Determinants of Seller‐Buyer Interactions during New Product Development in Technology‐Based Industrial Markets , 2011 .

[11]  J. E. Navas-López,et al.  Towards ‘An Intellectual Capital-Based View of the Firm’: Origins and Nature , 2011 .

[12]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[13]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[14]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  Richard A. Lancioni,et al.  Managing knowledge in industrial markets: New dimensions and challenges , 2009 .

[16]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[17]  Taru Hakanen.  Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator , 2014 .

[18]  R. Ireland,et al.  Social Capital and Learning Advantages: A Problem of Absorptive Capacity , 2014 .

[19]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[20]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets , 2009 .

[21]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm , 2011 .

[22]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[23]  Francisco J. Martínez-López,et al.  Dynamic Marketing Capabilities: Toward an Integrative Framework , 2014 .

[24]  R. Huggins.  Forms of Network Resource: Knowledge Access and the Role of Inter-Firm Networks , 2009 .

[25]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Proposing and Testing an Intellectual Capital-Based View of the Firm , 2006 .

[26]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[27]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[28]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[29]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[30]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[31]  Alison M. Dean,et al.  Can Ideas be Capital? Factors of Production in the Postindustrial Economy: A Review and Critique , 2007 .

[32]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[33]  J. Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  The performance effect of organizational learning and market orientation , 2007 .