The effects of different inlet conditions on the exit flow from a fluidic precessing jet nozzle

The fluidic precessing jet (FPJ) shown in Figure 1 is one of a family of self-excited oscillating jet flows that has found application in reducing Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) from combustion systems in the high temperature process industries. Its flow field is highly three-dimensional and unsteady, and many aspects of it remain unresolved. Velocity data measured close to the exit plane is presented for a variety of FPJ nozzles with three different inlet conditions, namely a long pipe, a smooth contraction and an orifice. The results indicate that jet inlets which are known to have asymmetrically shedding initial boundary layer, such as that produced by either an orifice or a pipe, trigger jet precession more easily than jet inlets which are known to have symmetrically shedding initial boundary layers. Although the exit flow is dominated by the reliability with which a given configuration generates precession, the three different inlet conditions also produce subtle differences in the exit profiles of mean velocity and turbulence intensity when the flow does precess reliably.

[1]  P. V. Lanspeary,et al.  Phase-averaged velocity in a fluidic precessing jet nozzle and in its near external field , 2003 .

[2]  J. Mi,et al.  Mixing Characteristics of Axisymmetric Free Jets From a Contoured Nozzle, an Orifice Plate and a Pipe , 2001 .

[3]  Khairul Q. Zaman,et al.  Spreading characteristics of compressible jets from nozzles of various geometries , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  S. J. Hill,et al.  An axisymmetric ‘fluidic’ nozzle to generate jet precession , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Mark F. Reeder,et al.  The evolution of a jet with vortex-generating tabs: real-time visualization and quantitative measurements , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  W. Quinn Mean flow and turbulence measurements in a triangular turbulent free jet , 1990 .

[7]  J. Militzer,et al.  Effects of nonparallel exit flow on round turbulent free jets , 1989 .

[8]  K. Bremhorst,et al.  Clock-induced bias errors in laser Doppler counter processors , 1989 .

[9]  W. G. Tiederman,et al.  Biasing correction for individual realization of laser anemometer measurements in turbulent flows , 1973 .

[10]  S. Crow,et al.  Orderly structure in jet turbulence , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  P. V. Lanspeary,et al.  Preliminary study of oscillating triangular jets , 2001 .

[12]  P. V. Lanspeary,et al.  Phase averaged velocity field within a fluidic processing jet nozzle , 2001 .

[13]  C. Manias,et al.  New combustion technology for lime production , 1996 .

[14]  G. Nathan,et al.  Low NOx clinker production , 1994 .

[15]  B. Price,et al.  Quality control analysis using XRF spectrometers , 1994 .

[16]  G. Nathan The enhanced mixing burner , 1988 .

[17]  A. Melling,et al.  Principles and practice of laser-Doppler anemometry , 1976 .