Frequently Used Devices in Dentistry Research

The presence of the human eye in examining the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of materials is exclusively insufficient. For this rea son, the devices which enables the smaller details to be seen have been developed. Because the processing of beams reflected from objects are fundamental in generating vision and images, obtaining much shorte r wavelenghts than visible lights have was required i n order to reduce into smaller microscales by

[1]  L. Marton,et al.  Early History of the Electron Microscope , 1968 .

[2]  Atomic force microscopy nanoindentation of a dental restorative midifill composite. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  M. Richards,et al.  Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation. , 2009, General dentistry.

[4]  A. Diaspro,et al.  Atomic force microscopy in vitro study of surface roughness and fractal character of a dental restoration composite after air-polishing , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[5]  F. G. Zaki Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy , 1975 .

[6]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Structural effects of sodium hypochlorite solutions on gutta-percha cones: atomic force microscopy study. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  T. Chu,et al.  Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Albert J Feilzer,et al.  Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[9]  I. Denry,et al.  Effects of External Bleaching on Indentation and Abrasion Characteristics of Human Enamel in vitro , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[10]  S. Huja,et al.  Impact energy absorption of three mouthguard materials in three environments. , 2010, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[11]  T. Akova,et al.  Influence of different indentation load and dwell time on Knoop microhardness tests for composite materials , 2004 .

[12]  M. Wolkewitz,et al.  Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  C. Hämmerle,et al.  Visual and Spectrophotometric Shade Analysis of Human Teeth , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[14]  A G Wee,et al.  Evaluating porcelain color match of different porcelain shade-matching systems. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[15]  A. Boztuǧ,et al.  Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials , 2013, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[16]  J. Powers,et al.  Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites. , 2009, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  G. Bolayir,et al.  Investigation of Mechanical and Structural Properties of Blend Lignin-PMMA , 2013 .

[18]  A. Yap,et al.  Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  Jane D Brewer,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  C. Rahiotis,et al.  Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.