Histomorphometry of Distraction Osteogenesis in a Caprine Tibial Lengthening Model

Standardized histomorphometry of bone formation and remodeling during distraction osteogenesis (DO) has not been well characterized. Increasing the rhythm or number of incremental lengthenings performed per day is reported to enhance bone formation during limb lengthening. In 17 skeletally immature goats, unilateral tibial lengthenings to 20 or 30% of original length were performed at a rate of 0.75 mm/day and rhythms of 1, 4, or 720 times per day using standard Ilizarov external fixation and an autodistractor system. Two additional animals underwent frame application and osteotomy without lengthening and served as osteotomy healing controls. Histomorphometric indices were measured at predetermined regions from undecalcified tibial specimens. Within the distraction region, bone formation and remodeling activity were location dependent. Intramembranous bone formed linearly oriented columns of interconnecting trabecular plates of woven and lamellar type bone. Total new bone volume and bone formation indices were significantly increased within the distraction and osteotomy callus regions (Tb.BV/TV, 226% [p < 0.05]; BFR/BS, 235–650% [p < 0.01]) respectively, compared with control metaphyseal bone. Bone formation indices were greatest adjacent to the mineralization zones at the center of the distraction gap; mineral apposition rate 96% (p < 0.01); mineralized bone surfaces 277% [p < 0.001]); osteoblast surfaces 359% [p < 0.001]); and bone formation rate (650% [p < 0.01]). There was no significant difference (p < 0.14; R = 0.4) in the bone formation rate of the distracted callus compared with the osteotomy control callus. Within the original cortices of the lengthened tibiae, bone remodeling indices were significantly increased compared with osteotomy controls; activation frequency (200% [p < 0.05]); osteoclast surfaces (295% [p < 0.01]); erosion period (75%); porosity (240% [p < 0.001]). Neither the rhythm of distraction nor the percent lengthening appeared to significantly influence any morphometric parameter evaluated. Distraction osteogenesis shares many features of normal fracture gap healing. The enhanced bone formation and remodeling appeared to result more from increased recruitment and activation of bone forming and resorbing cells rather than from an increased level of individual cellular activity.

[1]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of the Mechanical Environment During Distraction Osteogenesis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  R. Browne,et al.  Intraosseous infusion of prostaglandin E2 prevents disuse‐induced bone loss in the tibia , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  J. Peltonen,et al.  Early bone matrix formation during distraction. A biochemical study in sheep. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  J. Aronson,et al.  Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal with diaphyseal sites. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  E R Draper,et al.  The vascular response to fracture micromovement. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  S. Keila,et al.  Bone marrow from mechanically unloaded rat bones expresses reduced osteogenic capacity in vitro , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  M P Akhter,et al.  Bone response to alternate‐day mechanical loading of the rat tibia , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  J Y Rho,et al.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  C Neidlinger-Wilke,et al.  Cyclic stretching of human osteoblasts affects proliferation and metabolism: A new experimental method and its application , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  J. Peltonen,et al.  Distraction bone healing. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  G V Cochran,et al.  Streaming potentials in healing, remodeling, and intact cortical bone , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J Kenwright,et al.  The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  E Y Chao,et al.  Bone-healing patterns affected by loading, fracture fragment stability, fracture type, and fracture site compression. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  C. Johnston,et al.  Intraosseous infusion of prostaglandin E2 in the caprine tibia , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  O O Oni,et al.  Early histological and ultrastructural changes in medullary fracture callus. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  E. Chao,et al.  Formation of bone in tibial defects in a canine model. Histomorphometric and biomechanical studies. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  S. Pollack,et al.  The proliferative and synthetic response of isolated calvarial bone cells of rats to cyclic biaxial mechanical strain. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  S M Perren,et al.  Role of interfragmentary strain in fracture healing: Ovine model of a healing osteotomy , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  P. Kelly,et al.  Effect of weight-bearing on healing of cortical defects in the canine tibia. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  E Y Chao,et al.  Internal remodeling of periosteal new bone during fracture healing , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  A. Hulth,et al.  Current concepts of fracture healing. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  A. Alter Current techniques of limb lengthening: D. Paley. J Pediatr Orthop 8:73–92, (January/February), 1988 , 1989 .

[23]  E. Chao,et al.  The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J. Aronson,et al.  The histology of distraction osteogenesis using different external fixators. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  E. Karaharju,et al.  Regeneration after physeal distraction of the radius in sheep. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  D. Paley,et al.  Current Techniques of Limb Lengthening , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[28]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  E. Chao,et al.  Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  E. Chao,et al.  Comparison of the effects of compression plates and external fixators on early bone-healing. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Ilizarov Ga,et al.  Dynamics of the count of bone marrow cells forming fibroblast colonies in culture and its relation to osteogenesis activity in the reparative regeneration of the lengthened limb , 1983 .

[32]  A. Alho,et al.  Filling of a bone defect during experimental osteotaxis distraction. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[33]  J. Leong,et al.  Viscoelastic behavior of tissue in leg lengthening by distraction. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  P. Heikkilä,et al.  Bone formation after distraction osteotomy of the radius in sheep. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[35]  J. Shearer,et al.  Histology of a lengthened human tibia. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[36]  W. Jee,et al.  Prostaglandin E2 prevents disuse-induced cortical bone loss. , 1992, Bone.

[37]  P. Lascombes,et al.  [Histomorphometry of bone regenerate in limb lenghthening by the Ilizarov's technique]. , 1991, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[38]  J. Aronson,et al.  Preliminary studies of mineralization during distraction osteogenesis. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  Yong Jin Kim,et al.  Distraction Epiphysiolysis as a Method of Limb Lengthening , 1990 .

[40]  D B Burr,et al.  The effects of altered strain environments on bone tissue kinetics. , 1989, Bone.

[41]  L. Claes,et al.  Interfragmentary Strain and Bone Healing–An Experimental Study , 1988 .

[42]  D. Carter Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  H. Frost The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. , 1983, Henry Ford Hospital medical journal.

[44]  E. Bonucci,et al.  Distraction epiphysiolysis as a method of limb lengthening. II. Morphologic investigations. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[45]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  [Basic principles of transosseous compression and distraction osteosynthesis]. , 1971, Ortopediia travmatologiia i protezirovanie.