Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG

The discrete sampling of the brain’s electrical field at the scalp surface with individual recording sensors is subject to the same sampling error as the discrete sampling of the time series at any one sensor with analog-to-digital conversion. Unlike temporal sampling, spatial sampling is intrinsically discrete, so that the post hoc application of analog anti-aliasing filters is not possible. However, the skull acts as a low-pass spatial filter of the brain’s electrical field, attenuating the high spatial frequency information. Because of the skull’s spatial filtering, a discrete sampling of the spatial field with a reasonable number of scalp electrodes is possible. In this paper, we provide theoretical and experimental evidence that adequately sampling the human electroencephalograph (EEG) across the full surface of the head requires a minimum of 128 sensors. Further studies with each of the major EEG and event-related potential phenomena are required in order to determine the spatial frequency of these phenomena and in order to determine whether additional increases in sensor density beyond 128 channels will improve the spatial resolution of the scalp EEG.

[1]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[2]  P. Nunez,et al.  Spatial filtering and neocortical dynamics: estimates of EEG coherence , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  MEG-compatible multichannel EEG electrode array. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Frequency dependence of the transmission of the EEG from cortex to scalp. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  A. J. Hermans,et al.  A model of the spatial-temporal characteristics of the alpha rhythm. , 1982, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  M I Posner,et al.  Topography of the N400: brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Paul J. Coleman,et al.  Spatial power spectra of the crustal geomagnetic field and core geomagnetic field , 1980 .

[9]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Cohen,et al.  MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[11]  Malcolm G. McLeod Orthogonality of spherical harmonic coefficients , 1980 .

[12]  A. Gevins,et al.  The future of the EEG and MEG. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Malmivuo,et al.  Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  M Hallett,et al.  A method for determining optimal interelectrode spacing for cerebral topographic mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.