Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification

Highlights • We analyzed fetal heart rate of normal and acidemic fetuses. • We used conventional and nonlinear features for the signal analysis. • Addition of nonlinear features improves accuracy of classification. • The best nonlinear features are: Lempel Ziv complexity and Sample entropy. • Combination of conventional and nonlinear features provides the best accuracy. Abstract Fetal heart rate (FHR) is used to evaluate fetal well-being and enables clinicians to detect ongoing hypoxia during delivery. Routine clinical evaluation of intrapartum FHR is based on macroscopic morphological features visible to the naked eye. In this paper we evaluated conventional features and compared them to the nonlinear ones in the task of intrapartum FHR classification. The experiments were performed using a database of 217 FHR records with objective annotations, i.e. pH measurement. We have proven that the addition of nonlinear features improves accuracy of classification. The best classification results were achieved using a combination of conventional and nonlinear features with sensitivity of 73.4%, specificity of 76.3%, and F -measure of 71.9%. The best selected nonlinear features were: Lempel Ziv complexity, Sample entropy, and fractal dimension estimated by Higuchi method. Since the results of automatic signal evaluation are easily reproducible, the process of FHR evaluation can become more objective and may enable clinicians to focus on additional non-cardiotocography parameters influencing the fetus during delivery.

[1]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , 1985 .

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[3]  C.D. Stylios,et al.  Classification of fetal heart rate during labour using hidden Markov models , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[4]  T. Higuchi Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory , 1988 .

[5]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  J. P. Marques de Sá,et al.  The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[8]  N A Gough,et al.  Fractal analysis of foetal heart rate variability. , 1993, Physiological measurement.

[9]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Complexity analysis of 24 hours heart rate variability time series , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Floris Takens,et al.  On the numerical determination of the dimension of an attractor , 1985 .

[11]  Steven Salzberg,et al.  On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls to Avoid and a Recommended Approach , 1997, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[12]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Hanqing Cao,et al.  Toward quantitative fetal heart rate monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  D. Koutsouris,et al.  Computerised intrapartum diagnosis of fetal hypoxia based on fetal heart rate monitoring and fetal pulse oximetry recordings utilising wavelet analysis and neural networks , 2002, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  Amparo Alonso-Betanzos,et al.  Empirical evaluation of a hybrid intelligent monitoring system using different measures of effectiveness , 2002, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[16]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[17]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[18]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Classification of cardiotocographic records by neural networks , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium.

[19]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the fetal heart rate signal for the identification of fetal distress , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  S. Pincus Approximate entropy (ApEn) as a complexity measure. , 1995, Chaos.

[22]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Feature Extraction and Classification of Fetal Heart Rate Using Wavelet Analysis and Support Vector Machines , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[24]  J. Parer,et al.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. , 1997, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[25]  S. Nash,et al.  Numerical methods and software , 1990 .

[26]  David Ruelle,et al.  Deterministic chaos: the science and the fiction , 1995 .

[27]  P. Steer Has electronic fetal heart rate monitoring made a difference. , 2008, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[28]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Complexity analysis of the fetal heart rate variability: early identification of severe intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[29]  Tiina Luukkaala,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation , 2006, Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

[30]  Z. J. Yang,et al.  The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[31]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[32]  Abraham Lempel,et al.  On the Complexity of Finite Sequences , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[33]  L. Cao Practical method for determining the minimum embedding dimension of a scalar time series , 1997 .

[34]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[35]  I. Amer-Wåhlin,et al.  Implementation of new medical techniques: Experience from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on fetal ECG during labor , 2005, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[36]  A Ugwumadu,et al.  Author response to: Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG‐ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[37]  A L Goldberger,et al.  On a mechanism of cardiac electrical stability. The fractal hypothesis. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period. , 2007, Early human development.

[39]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[40]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern classification, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[41]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[42]  Esa Alhoniemi,et al.  SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5 , 2000 .

[43]  Leon Glass,et al.  Introduction to controversial topics in nonlinear science: is the normal heart rate chaotic? , 2009, Chaos.

[44]  J. V. van Laar,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[45]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[46]  Tao Xiong,et al.  A combined SVM and LDA approach for classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[47]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Akihiko Kikuchi,et al.  Changes in fractal features of fetal heart rate during pregnancy. , 2005, Early human development.

[49]  P Van Leeuwen,et al.  Circadian aspects of apparent correlation dimension in human heart rate dynamics. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[50]  E. Ifeachor,et al.  A Comparative Study of Fetal Heart Rate Variability Analysis Techniques , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[51]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Novel approach for fetal heart rate classification introducing grammatical evolution , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[52]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[53]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Sex differences in linear and complex fetal heart rate dynamics of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2009, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[54]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms , 1997, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[55]  K. Maršál,et al.  Fetal electrocardiography in labor and neonatal outcome: data from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on intrapartum fetal monitoring. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  K. Maršál,et al.  ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor. , 2011, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[57]  D. Ruelle,et al.  The Claude Bernard Lecture, 1989 - Deterministic chaos: the science and the fiction , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[58]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[59]  James Theiler,et al.  Lacunarity in a best estimator of fractal dimension , 1988 .

[60]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Classification of foetal heart rate sequences based on fractal features , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[61]  D G Chaffin,et al.  The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[62]  K. Greene,et al.  ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART RATE MONITORING : RESEARCH GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION. AUTHOR'S REPLY , 1997 .

[63]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Comparison of Doppler ultrasound and direct electrocardiography acquisition techniques for quantification of fetal heart rate variability , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[64]  J. Sprott Chaos and time-series analysis , 2001 .

[65]  A. Ugwumadu,et al.  Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[66]  Pincus Sm,et al.  Approximate Entropy: A Regularity Measure for Fetal Heart Rate Analysis , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[67]  Maria Romano,et al.  PSD modifications of FHRV due to interpolation and CTG storage rate , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[68]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.