Modelling nursing activities: electronic patient records and their discontents.

A fully integrated and operating EPR in a clinical setting is hard to find: most applications can be found in outpatient or general practice settings or in isolated hospital wards. In clinical work practice problems with the electronic patient record (EPR) are frequent. These problems are at least partially due to the models of health care work embedded in EPRs. In this paper we will argue that these problems are at least partially due to the models of health care work embedded in current EPRs. We suggest that these models often contain projections of nurses' and doctors' work as it should be performed on the ward, rather than depicting how work is actually performed. We draw upon sociological insights to elucidate the fluid and pragmatic nature of healthcare work and give recommendations for the development of an empirically based EPR, which can support the work of nurses and other health care providers. We argue that these issues are of great importance to the nursing profession, since the EPR will help define the worksettings of the future. Since it is a tool that will impact the development of the nursing profession, nurses have and should have a stake in its development.

[1]  B. Buchanan,et al.  Expanding the concept of medical information: an observational study of physicians' information needs. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  A. Sellen,et al.  Toward the paperless hospital? , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  M Berg,et al.  Problems and promises of the protocol. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[4]  Marc Berg,et al.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  M Berg,et al.  Medical Work and the ComputerBased Patient Record: A Sociological Perspective , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  W T Goossen,et al.  Nursing information management and processing: a framework and definition for systems analysis, design and evaluation. , 1996, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[7]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[8]  S. L. Star,et al.  Analyzing due process in the workplace , 1986, TOIS.

[9]  Jami L. Ritter,et al.  Patient Care Information Systems , 1995, Computers in Health Care.

[10]  Axford Rl,et al.  Impact of clinical information systems on nursing practice. Nurses' perspectives. , 1996 .

[11]  James M. Nyce,et al.  The construction of knowledge in neurology: implications for hypermedia system development , 1990, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[12]  Ina Wagner,et al.  The Politics of Women's Work in Computerized Environments , 1995 .

[13]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[14]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[15]  M. Berg The construction of medical disposals Medical sociology and medical problem solving in clinical practice , 1992 .

[16]  P. Ngin,et al.  Work excitement among computer users in nursing. , 1993, Computers in nursing.

[17]  S. L. Star The Cultures of Computing , 1995 .

[18]  D. Allen,et al.  The nursing-medical boundary: a negotiated order? , 1997 .