Design of geocell reinforcement for supporting embankments on soft ground

The methods of design available for geocell-supported embankments are very few. Two of the earlier methods are considered in this paper and a third method is proposed and compared with them. In the first method called slip line method, plastic bearing failure of the soil was assumed and the additional resistance due to geocell layer is calculated using a non-symmetric slip line field in the soft foundation soil. In the second method based on slope stability analysis, general-purpose slope stability program was used to design the geocell mattress of required strength for embankment. In the third method proposed in this paper, geocell reinforcement is designed based on the plane strain finite element analysis of embankments. The geocell layer is modelled as an equivalent composite layer with modified strength and stiffness values. The strength and dimensions of geocell layer is estimated for the required bearing capacity or permissible deformations. These three design methods are compared through a design example. It is observed that the design method based on finite element simulations is most comprehensive because it addresses the issue of permissible deformations and also gives complete stress, deformation and strain behaviour of the embankment under given loading conditions.

[1]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  ANALYSIS OF GEOCELL REINFORCED-SOIL COVERS OVER LARGE SPAN CONDUITS , 1998 .

[2]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells , 1999 .

[3]  G. Madhavi Latha,et al.  Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand , 2007 .

[4]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Equivalent Continuum Simulations of Geocell Reinforced Sand Beds Supporting Strip Footings , 2008 .

[5]  N. Janbu Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests , 1963 .

[6]  D. J. Henkel,et al.  The Effect Measured of the Rubber Membrane on the Triaxial Compression Strength of Clay Samples , 1952 .

[7]  D. I. Bush,et al.  The design and construction of geocell foundation mattresses supporting embankments over soft grounds , 1990 .

[8]  K. J. Wu,et al.  Three-dimensional polyethylene geocells for erosion control and channel linings , 1992 .

[9]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  LARGE-SCALE MODEL TESTS OF GEOCOMPOSITE MATTRESSES OVER PEAT SUBGRADES , 1988 .

[10]  J. M. Duncan,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils , 1970 .

[11]  N. R. Krishnaswamy,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Investigations on Geocell-Supported Embankments , 2006 .

[12]  J. W. Cowland,et al.  Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a Geocell mattress foundation , 1993 .

[13]  Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal,et al.  MODEL STUDIES ON GEOCELL SUPPORTED EMBANKMENTS CONSTRUCTED OVER A SOFT CLAY FOUNDATION , 2000 .

[14]  A. Murali Krishna,et al.  Seismic response of wrap-faced reinforced soil-retaining wall models using shaking table tests , 2007 .

[15]  D. K. Baidya,et al.  Rainfall induced instability of mechanically stabilized earth embankments , 2009 .

[16]  G. Madhavi Latha,et al.  Parametric finite element analyses of geocell-supported embankments , 2007 .

[17]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils , 1993 .

[18]  R. Bathurst,et al.  Behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls using the finite element method , 1995 .