Improvements of safety management system in Korean chemical industry after a large chemical accident

Abstract This study addresses the systematic changes in laws, regulations, business cultures, and accident responses of organizations on a national level for chemical safety management after a large chemical release accident. The hydrogen fluoride leakage accident in Gu-mi City, in which 5 workers were killed and 18 were injured, has led the government to construct more practical plans and guidelines for managing and responding to chemical disasters. The governmental reorganization against chemical accidents such as Joint inter-agency The Chemical Emergency Preparedness Center, which is a specialized agency focused on responding to chemical disasters, has also contributed to the technology used in responses to chemical accidents, and as a result, it has become possible to cope with disasters more efficiently through cooperation among relevant agencies. Regarding relevant laws and regulations, the government has launched and clarified various acts and programs for the handling, management, and assessment of chemical substances and chemical-related accidents. Moreover, private enterprises have been also making efforts to systematically manage safety issues and expand high-level safety culture. In this paper, we discuss the changes in approaches to handle chemical accidents from various perspectives and present a case in which the relevant agencies succeeded in responding relatively efficiently to a major chemical accident because of these changes.

[1]  Other A Flexible Framework for Addressing Chemical Accident Prevention and Preparedness. A Guidance Document , 2010 .

[2]  Peter C. Ashbrook,et al.  College and university sector response to the U.S. Chemical Safety Board Texas Tech incident report and UCLA laboratory fatality , 2013 .

[3]  D M Perrotta,et al.  Acute health effects in a community after a release of hydrofluoric acid. , 1991, Archives of environmental health.

[4]  Hye-On Yoon,et al.  Fluorine distribution in soil in the vicinity of an accidental spillage of hydrofluoric acid in Korea. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[5]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Chemicals regulation and precaution: does REACH really incorporate the precautionary principle , 2007 .

[6]  C. U. Hyun,et al.  Assessment of hydrogen fluoride damage to vegetation using optical remote sensing data , 2013 .

[7]  Ian Herbert,et al.  The UK Buncefield incident – The view from a UK risk assessment engineer , 2010 .

[8]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  The legacy of Bhopal: The impact over the last 20 years and future direction , 2005 .

[9]  Sang Tae Chung,et al.  Case studies of chemical incidents and emergency information service in Korea , 2009 .

[10]  Zubair Ahmed,et al.  Disaster risks and disaster management policies and practices in Pakistan: A critical analysis of Disaster Management Act 2010 of Pakistan , 2013 .

[11]  Michael M Bradley,et al.  NARAC: an emergency response resource for predicting the atmospheric dispersion and assessing the consequences of airborne radionuclides. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[12]  Johanna Suikkanen,et al.  Lessons learned for process safety management in China , 2014 .

[13]  Ronald J. Willey,et al.  The Bhopal tragedy: its influence on process and community safety as practiced in the United States , 2005 .