Salvage Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The safety and activity of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients who have received prior ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway remains unknown. We evaluated ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC after prior treatment with anti-PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC who received prior anti-PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy and subsequently received ipilimumab and nivolumab were reviewed. Objective response rate and progression-free survival per investigator assessment were recorded. Toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab was also assessed. RESULTS Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included. All patients (100%) received prior ICIs targeting the PD-1 pathway. The median age was 62 years (range, 21-82 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the objective response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab was 20%. The median progression-free survival while on ipilimumab and nivolumab was 4 months (range, 0.8-19 months). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade with ipilimumab and nivolumab were recorded in 29 (64%) of the 45 patients; grade 3 irAEs were recorded in 6 (13%) of the 45 patients. CONCLUSION Ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic RCC who had prior treatment with checkpoint inhibition.

[1]  B. Melichar,et al.  Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma (TITAN-RCC) , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[2]  T. Powles,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Motzer,et al.  Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  E. Plimack,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The CheckMate 016 Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Raman,et al.  Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review , 2015, BioMed research international.

[8]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Combination Therapy with Anti–CTLA-4 and Anti–PD-1 Leads to Distinct Immunologic Changes In Vivo , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[9]  F. Hodi,et al.  Molecular Pathways: Next-Generation Immunotherapy—Inhibiting Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Programmed Death-1 , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  E. Wherry T cell exhaustion , 2011, Nature Immunology.

[11]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Control of peripheral T‐cell tolerance and autoimmunity via the CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 pathways , 2008, Immunological reviews.

[12]  S. Steinberg,et al.  High‐dose interleukin‐2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma , 2008, Cancer.

[13]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[14]  R. Motzer,et al.  Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.