Routine evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A practical approach

BackgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has excellent capabilities to assess ventricular systolic function. Current clinical scenarios warrant routine evaluation of ventricular diastolic function for complete evaluation, especially in congestive heart failure patients. To our knowledge, no systematic assessment of diastolic function over a range of lusitropy has been performed using CMR.Methods and ResultsLeft ventricular diastolic function was assessed in 31 subjects (10 controls) who underwent CMR and compared with Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) evaluation of mitral valve (MV) and pulmonary vein (PV) blood flow. Blood flow in the MV and PV were successfully imaged by CMR for all cases (31/31,100%) while TTE evaluated flow in all MV (31/31,100%) but only 21/31 PV (68%) cases. Velocities of MV flow (E and A) measured by CMR correlated well with TTE (r = 0.81, p < 0.001), but demonstrated a systematic underestimation by CMR compared to TTE (slope = 0.77). Bland-Altman analysis of the E:A ratio and deceleration time (DT) calculated from each modality showed excellent agreement (bias -0.29, and -10.3 ms for E:A and DT, respectively). When assessing morphology using TTE, CMR correctly identified patients as having normal or abnormal inflow conditions.ConclusionWe have shown that there is homology between CMR and TTE for the assessment of diastolic inflow over a wide range of conditions, including normal, impaired relaxation and restrictive. There is excellent agreement of quantitative velocity measurements between CMR and TTE. Diastolic blood flow assessment by CMR can be performed in a single scan, with times ranging from 20 sec to 3 min, and we show that there is good indication for applying CMR to assess diastolic conditions, either as an adjunctive test when evaluating systolic function, or even as a primary test when TTE data cannot be obtained.

[1]  S Simonsen,et al.  Determination of Pressure Gradient in Mitral Stenosis with a Non‐invasive Ultrasound Doppler Technique , 2009 .

[2]  S. Caruthers,et al.  Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography , 2003, Circulation.

[3]  W. Grossman,et al.  Evaluation and Management of Diastolic Heart Failure , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  T. Thom,et al.  American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee : Heart disease and stroke statistical-2006 update : A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke statistics subcommittee , 2006 .

[5]  P. Walker,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements. , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  David N. Firmin,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Jet Velocity Mapping in Mitral and Aortic Valve Stenosis , 1993, Circulation.

[7]  M Doyle,et al.  Rapid velocity-encoded cine imaging with turbo-BRISK. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[8]  D N Firmin,et al.  Mitral valve flow measured with cine MR velocity mapping in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with doppler echocardiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  N Fujita,et al.  Velocity-encoded cine MRI in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: measurement of mitral valve and pulmonary vein flow velocities and flow volume across the mitral valve. , 1993, American heart journal.

[10]  D. Brutsaert,et al.  New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part I: diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function. , 2002, Circulation.

[11]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  R. Pettigrew,et al.  Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Mark Doyle,et al.  Correction of temporal misregistration artifacts in jet flow by conventional phase‐contrast MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M Kouwenhoven,et al.  Motion Induced Phase Shifts in MR: Acceleration Effects in Quantitative Flow Measurements—A Reconsideration , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  C. Otto,et al.  Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  J. Johnson,et al.  Diastolic dysfunction in congestive heart failure. , 1991, Clinical pharmacy.

[17]  D. Brutsaert,et al.  New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part II: causal mechanisms and treatment. , 2002, Circulation.

[18]  R L Popp,et al.  Relation of Transmitral Flow Velocity Patterns to Left Ventricle Diastolic Function: New Insights From a Combined Hemodynamic and Doppler Echocardiographic Study , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Mark Doyle,et al.  Validation of Rapid Velocity Encoded Cine Imaging of a Dynamically Complex Flow Field Using Turbo Block Regional Interpolation Scheme for k Space , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  L. Hatle,et al.  Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[22]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Diastolic heart failure--abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  C. Appleton Doppler assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: the refinements continue. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[25]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. , 1995, American journal of hypertension.

[26]  Wei Liu,et al.  Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  C. Higgins,et al.  Normal cardiac dimensions by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.