The Need for a Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the Oil Tanker Industry and a Qualitative Assessment of Oil Tanker Groundings

Abstract : The culture, design, and operation of the maritime industry all contribute to create an error-inducing system. As oil tankers have become larger, the tolerance for error has decreased as the consequences have increased. Highly visible oil spills have made society more aware of the dangers inherent with transporting oil at sea. A probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) provides a formal process of determining the full range of possible adverse occurrences, probabilities, and expected costs for any undesirable event. A PRA can identify those areas that offer the greatest risk-reducing potential. Once the components with the greatest risk-reducing potential are identified, appropriate technology and management schemes can properly influence risk reduction. Humans contribute to high consequence accidents in the design, construction and operations phases of an engineering system. While human error is attributed to 80 percent of the marine accidents, a closer look reveals that many accidents attributed to human error are system errors. An application of a qualitative risk assessment is done for tanker groundings. A fault tree is developed to describe the top event of a tanker grounding. A number of well-known groundings are analyzed to test the utility of the grounding fault tree.

[1]  C Young SEAFARER STANDARDS TO BE REVISED , 1995 .

[2]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN AND ORGANIZATION ERRORS (HOE) IN TANKER OPERATIONS , 1993 .

[3]  Elbert S. Maloney Dutton's Navigation and Piloting , 1978 .

[4]  Joel D. Sipes,et al.  Oil Pollution Act of 1990 , 1991 .

[5]  William H Moore The grounding of Exxon Valdez: an examination of the human and organizational factors , 1994 .

[6]  J. Krier,et al.  The Un-Easy Case for Technological Optimism , 1985 .

[7]  R. Ramakumar Engineering Reliability: Fundamentals and Applications , 1996 .

[8]  Peter G Noble SAFER TRANSPORT OF OIL AT SEA: A SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS. , 1993 .

[9]  Timothy J Gunner,et al.  GUNNER AND EDWARDS ON THE CARRIAGE OF CRUDE OIL BY SEA , 1986 .

[10]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human Factors in Engineering and Design , 1957 .

[11]  Donald Thomas Hornstein,et al.  Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis , 1992 .

[12]  J. R. Fragola,et al.  Human reliability analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Naresh K. Sinha,et al.  Modern Control Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  Robert G. Bea The Role of Human Error in Design, Construction, and Reliability of Marine Structures. , 1994 .

[15]  B P Jenner RISK CONTROL THROUGH QUALITY MANAGEMENT (FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND TOOLS) , 1992 .

[16]  A. E. Green Safety systems reliability , 1984 .

[17]  S Kristiansen,et al.  HUMAN AND ORGANISATIONAL FACTORS IN SAFE OPERATION AND POLLUTION PREVENTION , 1992 .

[18]  Ian J Lowry Improving Mariner/Ship Interaction , 1994 .

[19]  M. Modarres What every engineer should know about reliability and risk analysis , 1992 .

[20]  M B Mandler COAST GUARD PROBES HUMAN FACTORS , 1995 .

[21]  W. Duncan,et al.  Environmental risk assessment and management in the maritime industry: the interaction with ISO 9000, ISM, and ISM management systems , 1994 .

[22]  John S. Gardenier Ship Navigational Failure Detection and Diagnosis , 1981 .

[23]  Richard A. Cahill Strandings and their causes , 1985 .