Differences between cytotoxicity in photodynamic therapy using a pulsed laser and a continuous wave laser: study of oxygen consumption and photobleaching

Oxygen consumption at the targeted site has a significant effect on dosimetry in photodynamic therapy (PDT). However, oxygen consumption in PDT using a pulsed laser as a light source has not been clarified. We therefore investigated the dependence of cytotoxicity on the oxygen consumption and the photosensitizer photobleaching of PDT using a pulsed laser by comparing with that using a continuous wave (CW) laser. Mouse renal carcinoma cells (Renca) were incubated with a second-generation photosensitizer, PAD-S31. The cells were then irradiated with either a 670-nm nanosecond pulsed light from the 3rd harmonics of a Nd:YAG laser-pumped optical parametric oscillator with a peak fluence rate of ~1 MW/cm2 at 30 Hz or a 670-nm CW diode laser with a total light dose of 40 J/cm2. Regardless of laser source, cytotoxic effects exhibited cumulative dose responses to the photosensitizer ranging from 12 to 96 μg/ml. However, cytotoxic effect of PDT using the pulsed light was significantly less than that using the CW light with the photosensitizer concentrations of 24 and 48 μg/ml under identical fluence rates. During PDT, the cells exposed to the pulsed light consumed oxygen more slowly, resulting in a lower amount of oxygen consumption when compared with PDT using CW light. In accordance with oxygen consumption, the pulsed light induced significantly less photobleaching of the photosensitizer than the CW light did. These results indicate that the efficiency of PDT using pulsed light is less when compared with CW light, probably being related to suppressed oxygen consumption during the pulsed light irradiation.

[1]  H. Barr,et al.  Comparison of lasers for photodynamic therapy with a phthalocyanine photosensitizer , 1989, Lasers in Medical Science.

[2]  T J Dougherty,et al.  Photoradiation in the treatment of recurrent breast carcinoma. , 1979, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  T. Foster,et al.  Effects of photodynamic therapy on xenografts of human mesothelioma and rat mammary carcinoma in nude mice. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  T Nishisaka,et al.  Comparison of phototoxicity mechanism between pulsed and continuous wave irradiation in photodynamic therapy. , 1999, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[5]  T. Mosmann Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  H J Sterenborg,et al.  Photodynamic therapy with pulsed light sources: a theoretical analysis , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  M. Mori,et al.  In vitro Plasma Protein Binding and Cellular Uptake of ATX‐S10(Na), a Hydrophilic Chlorin Photosensitizer , 2000, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[8]  J. Moan,et al.  The mechanism of photodynamic inactivation of human cells in vitro in the presence of haematoporphyrin. , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  Tayyaba Hasan Multiphoton photobiologic effects , 1991, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[10]  T. Hasan,et al.  In vivo fluence rate and fractionation effects on tumor response and photobleaching: photodynamic therapy with two photosensitizers in an orthotopic rat tumor model. , 1999, Cancer research.

[11]  A. Curnow,et al.  Oxygen monitoring during 5-aminolaevulinic acid induced photodynamic therapy in normal rat colon. Comparison of continuous and fractionated light regimes. , 2000, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[12]  B. Henderson,et al.  Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  A. Schauer,et al.  Pulsed versus continuous wave excitation mechanisms in photodynamic therapy of differently graded squamous cell carcinomas in tumor-implanted nude mice , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[14]  Hirofumi Kawabe,et al.  A Comparison between Argon‐dye and Excimer‐dye Laser for Photodynamic Effect in Transplanted Mouse Tumor , 1992, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[15]  M. Mori,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy for Experimental Tumors Using ATX‐S10(Na), a Hydrophilic Chlorin Photosensitizer, and Diode Laser , 2000, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[16]  T. Foster,et al.  Oxygen consumption and diffusion effects in photodynamic therapy. , 1991, Radiation research.

[17]  G. Buonaccorsi,et al.  Enhancement of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced porphyrin photosensitisation in normal rat colon by threshold and light fractionation studies. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  L. Kunz,et al.  Intracellular Photobleaching of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(m-hydroxyphenyl) chlorin (Foscan®) Exhibits a Complex Dependence on Oxygen Level and Fluence Rate¶ , 2002, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[19]  A. Piskarskas,et al.  Fluence-rate-dependent photosensitized oxidation of NADH. , 1993, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[20]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Critical Parameters in the Cytotoxicity of Photodynamic Therapy Using a Pulsed Laser , 2002, Lasers in Medical Science.

[21]  C J Gomer,et al.  Direct comparison of in‐vitro and in‐vivo photofrin‐II mediated photosensitization using a pulsed KTP pumped dye laser and a continuous wave argon ion pumped dye laser , 1991, Lasers in surgery and medicine.