Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake

On 4 September 2010, a magnitude M w 7.1 earthquake struck the Canterbury region on the South Island of New Zealand. The epicentre of the earthquake was located in the Darfield area about 40 km west of the city of Christchurch. E xtensive damage was inflicted to lifelines and residential houses due to widespread liquefaction and lateral spreading in areas close to major s treams, rivers and wetlands throughout Christchurch and Kaiapoi. U nreinforced masonry buildings also suffered extensive damage throughout the region. Despite the severe damage to infrastructure and residential houses, fortunately, no deaths occurred and on ly two injuries were reported in this earthquake. From an engineering viewpoint, one may argue that the most significant aspects of the 2010 Darfield Earthquake were geotechnical in nature, with liquefaction and lateral spreading being the principal cu lpri ts for the inflicted damage. Following the earthquake, a n intensive geotechnical reconnaissance was conducted to capture evidence and perishable data from this event. The surveys were performed on foot, by car and from a helicopter over a period of six da ys. A broad - brush field reconnaissance was conducted in the first two days, followed by pin - point investigations at specific locations including detailed site inspections and field testing using: Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT), Swedish Weight Soundin g (SWS), and Spectral An alysis of Surface Waves (SASW). This paper summarizes the observations and preliminary findings from this early reconnaissance work .

[1]  A. Nicol,et al.  Holocene paleoearthquakes on the strike‐slip Porters Pass Fault, Canterbury, New Zealand , 2005 .

[2]  R. Norris,et al.  Late quaternary slip rates and slip partitioning on the Alpine Fault , 2001 .

[3]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  A. Nicol,et al.  A comparison of historical and paleoseismicity in a newly formed fault zone and a mature fault zone, North Canterbury, New Zealand , 1996 .

[5]  J. Berrill,et al.  Liquefaction at Kaiapoi in the 1901 Cheviot, New Zealand, earthquake , 1994 .

[6]  R. Dissen,et al.  Earthquake Source Identification and Characterisation for the Canterbury Region, South Island, New Zealand , 2001 .

[7]  L. H. Roehm,et al.  Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams , 1988 .

[8]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils , 2001 .

[9]  Nicholas A Alexander,et al.  Obtaining estimates of the low-frequency ‘fling’, instrument tilts and displacement timeseries using wavelet decomposition , 2010 .

[10]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[11]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity , 2000 .

[12]  J. M. Roesset,et al.  Characterization of geotechical sites by SASW method , 1994 .

[13]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[14]  George W. Housner,et al.  Spectrum Intensities of Strong-Motion Earthquakes , 1952 .

[15]  J. Beavan,et al.  Balancing the plate motion budget in the South Island, New Zealand using GPS, geological and seismological data , 2007 .

[16]  N. Donovan,et al.  Engineering Seismology , 1985 .

[17]  D. Hicks,et al.  The Selwyn River of New Zealand: a benchmark system for alluvial plain rivers , 2008 .