On the effect of different polymer matrix and fibre treatment on single fibre pullout test using betelnut fibres

Abstract This study is aimed at exploring the possibility of improving the interfacial adhesion strength of betelnut fibres using different chemical treatments namely 4% and 6% of HCl and NaOH respectively. The fibre specimens were partially embedded into different thermosetting polymer matrix (polyester and epoxy) as reinforcement blocks. Single fibre pullout tests were carried out for both the untreated (Ut) and treated betelnut fibres with different resins and tested under dry conditions. Scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the material failure morphology. The studies revealed the differences of interfacial adhesion strengths for the various test specimens of betelnut fibres treated with the polyester and epoxy matrix which followed in the order of: N6 ≫ N4 > H4 > Ut > H6. It was proven that fibres treated with 6% of NaOH exhibits excellent interfacial adhesion properties. The interfacial adhesion shear strength of these fibres using polyester and epoxy has improved by 141% and 115% correspondingly compared to untreated fibre under the same treatment.

[1]  R. Young,et al.  Lignin‐polypropylene composites. Part 1: Composites from unmodified lignin and polypropylene , 2002 .

[2]  Roberto Olayo,et al.  Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber-matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites , 1999 .

[3]  Zachariah Oommen,et al.  Dynamic mechanical analysis of banana fiber reinforced polyester composites , 2003 .

[4]  L. Ren,et al.  Dry sliding wear behaviour of bamboo , 1998 .

[5]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Tensile properties of short sisal fiber reinforced polystyrene composites , 1996 .

[6]  R. M. Pillai,et al.  Coconut fibre reinforced polyethylene composites: effect of natural waxy surface layer of the fibre on fibre/matrix interfacial bonding and strength of composites , 2005 .

[7]  S. W. Zhang.  State-of-the-art of polymer tribology , 1998 .

[8]  S. Amico,et al.  Pull-out and other evaluations in sisal-reinforced polyester biocomposites , 2003 .

[9]  A. Rana,et al.  Short jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: Dynamic mechanical study , 1999 .

[10]  S. Monteiro,et al.  Sugar Cane Bagasse Waste as Reinforcement in Low Cost Composites , 1998 .

[11]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Mechanical properties of sisal/oil palm hybrid fiber reinforced natural rubber composites , 2004 .

[12]  B. Watts,et al.  Preparation and characterization of AlVO4 compound , 2004 .

[13]  S. Eichhorn,et al.  Review: Current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites , 2001 .

[14]  T. Ramanathan,et al.  Investigation of the influence of acidic and basic surface groups on carbon fibres on the interfacial shear strength in an epoxy matrix by means of single-fibre pull-out test , 2001 .

[15]  B. F. Yousif,et al.  Polyester composite based on betelnut fibre for tribological applications , 2010 .

[16]  C. Zweben,et al.  Fiber reinforcements and general theory of composites , 2000 .

[17]  A. Rajulu,et al.  Effect of alkali treatment on properties of the lignocellulose fabric Hildegardia , 2003 .

[18]  Martin P. Ansell,et al.  The effect of alkalization and fibre alignment on the mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf and hemp bast fibre composites: Part 1 – polyester resin matrix , 2004 .

[19]  B. Kokta,et al.  Improvement of the mechanical properties of sawdust wood fibre—polystyrene composites by chemical treatment , 1988 .

[20]  Manjusri Misra,et al.  Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of laminated biocomposites from poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and kenaf fibers , 2008 .

[21]  J. Ogando,et al.  For better process control, start with simulation , 1999 .

[22]  L. Ren,et al.  Effects of vascular fiber content on abrasive wear of bamboo , 2005 .

[23]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  Effect of interfacial adhesion and statistical fiber strength on tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber/epoxy composites. Part I: experiment results , 2000 .

[24]  A. Rajulu,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Short, Natural Fiber Hildegardia populifolia-reinforced Styrenated Polyester Composites , 2005 .

[25]  D. Fontanelli,et al.  Mechanical properties of jute fibers and interface strength with an epoxy resin , 2000 .

[26]  J. George,et al.  Mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites , 1999 .

[27]  B. F. Yousif,et al.  Wear and frictional performance of betelnut fibre-reinforced polyester composite , 2009 .

[28]  G. Mount.  The wettability of bonding resins used in the composite resin/glass ionomer 'sandwich technique'. , 1989, Australian dental journal.

[29]  P. Herrera-Franco,et al.  Mechanical properties of continuous natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites , 2004 .

[30]  M. Rong,et al.  Self-reinforced melt processable composites of sisal , 2003 .

[31]  N. El-Tayeb.  A study on the potential of sugarcane fibers/polyester composite for tribological applications , 2008 .

[32]  M. Ansell,et al.  Jute-reinforced polyester composites , 1985 .

[33]  M. Scandola,et al.  Flax fibre–polyester composites , 2004 .

[34]  Zachariah Oommen,et al.  A comparison of the mechanical properties of phenol formaldehyde composites reinforced with banana fibres and glass fibres , 2002 .

[35]  Y. Grohens,et al.  Influence of chemical treatments on surface properties and adhesion of flax fibre-polyester resin , 2006 .

[36]  Hanafi Ismail,et al.  The effect of acetylation on interfacial shear strength between plant fibres and various matrices , 2001 .

[37]  M. Ansell,et al.  The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok for composite reinforcement , 1999 .

[38]  B. F. Yousif,et al.  Effect of betelnut fibres treatment and contact conditions on adhesive wear and frictional performance of polyester composites , 2010 .