Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis

Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) involves techniques which relatively recently have received great increase in interest for their capabilities of solving spatial decision problems. One of the most frequently used techniques of MCDA is Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In the AHP, decision-makers make pairwise comparisons between different criteria to obtain values of their relative importance. The AHP initially only dealt with crisp numbers or exact values in the pairwise comparisons, but later it has been modified and adapted to also consider fuzzy values. It is necessary to empirically validate the ability of the fuzzified AHP for solving spatial problems. Further, the effects of different levels of fuzzification on the method have to be studied. In the context of a hypothetical GIS-based decision-making problem of locating a dam in Costa Rica using real-world data, this paper illustrates and compares the effects of increasing levels of uncertainty exemplified through different levels of fuzzification of the AHP. Practical comparison of the methods in this work, in accordance with the theoretical research, revealed that by increasing the level of uncertainty or fuzziness in the fuzzy AHP, differences between results of the conventional and fuzzy AHPs become more significant. These differences in the results of the methods may affect the final decisions in decision-making processes. This study concludes that the AHP is sensitive to the level of fuzzification and decision-makers should be aware of this sensitivity while using the fuzzy AHP. Furthermore, the methodology described may serve as a guideline on how to perform a sensitivity analysis in spatial MCDA. Depending on the character of criteria weights, i.e. the degree of fuzzification, and its impact on the results of a selected decision rule (e.g. AHP), the results from a fuzzy analysis may be used to produce sensitivity estimates for crisp AHP MCDA methods.

[1]  Eastman J. Ronald,et al.  RASTER PROCEDURES FOR MULTI-CRITERIA/MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISIONS , 1995 .

[2]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[3]  Jennifer Shu-Jen Lin,et al.  Note on Deriving Weights from Pairwise Comparison Matrices in AHP , 2008 .

[4]  J. Barzilai.  Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[5]  J. Malczewski,et al.  Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis , 2006 .

[6]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[7]  D. Chang.  Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[8]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model , 2003, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  V. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in siting MSW landfills , 2006 .

[10]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[11]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  Parameterized defuzzification with maximum entropy weighting function - Another view of the weighting function expectation method , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[12]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[13]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[14]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  A FUZZY GIS MODELING APPROACH FOR URBAN LAND EVALUATION , 1992 .

[15]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Abbas Alimohammadi,et al.  Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  An improved Fuzzy Kappa statistic that accounts for spatial autocorrelation , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Use of a GIS in reconnaissance studies for small-scale hydropower development in a developing country: a case study from Tanzania , 1996 .

[20]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An extension of the Analytical Hierarchy Process using OWA operators , 1999, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[21]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  J. Buckley.  Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1985 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[25]  L. Warren.  Uncertainties in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[26]  Serwan M. J. Baban,et al.  Modelling Optimum Sites for Locating Reservoirs in Tropical Environments , 2003 .

[27]  Ching-Chow Yang,et al.  KEY QUALITY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING FUZZY AHP , 2004 .

[28]  Arika Ligmann-Zielinska,et al.  A Framework for Sensitivity Analysis in Spatial Multiple Criteria Evaluation , 2008, GIScience.

[29]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[30]  Samee Ullah Khan,et al.  Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Krishna Prasad Vadrevu,et al.  Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis—a case study , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[32]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management: K. Kovar and H.P. Nachtnebel (editors), Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 1993, 694 + xii pp., US$ 80.00, ISBN 0-947571-48-5 , 1995 .

[34]  T. Saaty.  There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006 .