Earthquake cycle dominates contemporary crustal deformation in Central and Southern Andes

With the advent of global positioning system (GPS) technology and its applications to high precision geodesy, earth scientists have gained an unprecedented opportunity to study the kinematics and dynamics of present-day deformation processes along plate boundary zones. However, until now our knowledge of the deformation processes associated with the Andean subduction along the western coast of South America has been limited. Here we present first estimates of present-day crustal deformation rates in the central and southern sections of the Andes, between latitudes 22‡S and 42‡S. We find that the deformation in the central section of our study area is dominated by the interseismic phase of an earthquake deformation cycle, caused by 100% coupling of the thrust interface between the subducting Nazca and the overriding South America plates. The estimated depth of coupling is not uniform along strike: north of 30‡S it is V33 km deep, while south of 35‡S it reaches 50 km depth. In addition, we observed postseismic relaxation effects in the northern part of our network in the area of the 1995 Mw8.0 Antofagasta earthquake. South of 38‡S, we detected a similar deformation pattern as in the Antofagasta area which we attribute to postseismic relaxation effects of the 1960 Mw9.5 Valdivia earthquake. fl 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  S. Kay,et al.  Lithospheric structure and along-strike segmentation of the Central Andean Plateau: seismic Q, magmatism, flexure, topography and tectonics , 1996 .

[2]  G. Plafker,et al.  Alaskan Earthquake of 1964 and Chilean Earthquake of 1960: Implications for Arc Tectonics , 1972 .

[3]  S. Cande,et al.  Episodic development of a convergent margin inferred from structures and processes along the southern Chile margin , 1997 .

[4]  J. Kley,et al.  Along-strike segmentation of the Andean foreland , 1996 .

[5]  J. Kley,et al.  Along-strike segmentation of the Andean foreland: causes and consequences , 1999 .

[6]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Membrane strain rates in the subducting plate beneath South America , 1995 .

[7]  Detlef Angermann,et al.  Space-geodetic estimation of the nazca-south america euler vector , 1999 .

[8]  Y. Okada.  Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Steven C. Cohen.  Numerical Models of Crustal Deformation in Seismic Zones , 1999 .

[10]  J. Freymueller,et al.  Spatial variations in present‐day deformation, Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and their implications , 2000 .

[11]  Crustal motion north and south of the Arica deflection: Comparing recent geodetic results from the central Andes , 2000 .

[12]  L. Ruff,et al.  Seismic coupling along the Chilean Subduction Zone , 1991 .

[13]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Current deformation and the width of the seismogenic zone of the northern Cascadia subduction thrust , 1994 .

[14]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Three‐dimensional dislocation model for great earthquakes of the Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1997 .

[15]  T. Dixon,et al.  Space geodetic observations of nazca-south america convergence across the central andes , 1998, Science.

[16]  J. Kley,et al.  Tectonic shortening and crustal thickness in the Central Andes: How good is the correlation? , 1998 .

[17]  Andean tectonics related to geometry of subducted Nazca plate , 1983 .

[18]  Thomas A. Cahill,et al.  Seismicity and shape of the subducted Nazca Plate , 1992 .

[19]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[20]  Detlef Angermann,et al.  GPS-derived Deformation of the Central Andes Including the 1995 Antofagasta Mw = 8.0 Earthquake , 1999 .

[21]  H. Philip,et al.  Recent crustal deformation in the Antofagasta region (northern Chile) and the subduction process , 1998 .

[22]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Joint estimation of afterslip rate and postseismic relaxation following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1998 .

[23]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone , 2001 .

[24]  D. Chinn,et al.  Accurate source depths and focal mechanisms of shallow earthquakes in western South America and in the New Hebrides Island Arc , 1983 .

[25]  T. Jordan,et al.  Variability in Age of Initial Shortening and Uplift in the Central Andes, 16–33°30′S , 1997 .

[26]  Kelin Wang,et al.  The updip and downdip limits to great subduction earthquakes: Thermal and structural models of Casca , 1999 .