Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems

In this paper, we present a framework for resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems. The conflicts occur in the decision making process of time-constrained tasks of those goals. The agents observe the environment, generate the tasks based on their obligation to an authority, their desires, and intentions. They select and execute the tasks from a set of pre-compiled tasks based on their beliefs of the reward and penalty associated with the selected tasks. To resolve the conflicts within the constraint of the tasks' duration, we supplement the agents' normative capacity with two essential functions: Sacrifice and Diligence. The Sacrifice function enables an agent to reason and discard any tasks that have lower priorities to make way for accomplishment of the normative goal. The Diligence function enables an agent to increase its effort in accomplishing the normative goal in time-constrained situations. We simulate these situations and present the results.

[1]  Frank S. de Boer,et al.  A Verification Framework for Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2008, PRIMA.

[2]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[3]  Fabiola López y López,et al.  An architecture for autonomous normative agents , 2004, Proceedings of the Fifth Mexican International Conference in Computer Science, 2004. ENC 2004..

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Applying Coordination Mechanisms for Dependency Relationships Under Various Environments , 2004 .

[5]  Michael Luck,et al.  Argumentation Based Resolution of Conflicts between Desires and Normative Goals , 2009, ArgMAS.

[6]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Deliberative Normative Agents: Principles and Architecture , 1999, ATAL.

[7]  Guido Boella,et al.  Fulfilling or violating obligations in normative multiagent systems , 2004 .

[8]  Benoit Lacroix,et al.  The Use of Norms Violations to Model Agents Behavioral Variety , 2008, COIN@AAMAS&AAAI.

[9]  Guido Boella,et al.  Norm governed multiagent systems: the delegation of control to autonomous agents , 2003, IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2003. IAT 2003..

[10]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Automated requirements-driven definition of norms for the regulation of behavior in multi-agent systems , 2008 .

[11]  John Thangarajah,et al.  Aborting tasks in BDI agents , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[12]  Martin Neumann,et al.  Norm Internalisation in Human and Artificial Intelligence , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..