Project characteristics and performance in Europe: An empirical analysis for large transport infrastructure projects

Infrastructure megaprojects are historically associated with poor delivery, both in terms of cost and schedule performance. Large Transport Infrastructure Projects (TIPs) are amongst the most controversial and are often delivered late, over budget, and providing less benefit than expected. While there is a growing theoretical body of literature addressing TIPs, empirical research is still required to determine which TIPs characteristics affect TIPs schedule & cost performance. This paper addresses this issue, applying an empirically-based methodology to a dataset of 30 European TIPs. The results highlight the importance of financial support from the government and the strong influence of both external and internal stakeholders, mainly in relation to their early engagement and to their nationality. Technological characteristics and the presence of Special Purpose Entities are also correlated with the TIPs performance. These key findings both support and contradict the literature, and are relevant for both policy makers and project managers during the decision-making process, planning and delivery of TIPs.

[1]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Geographical Variation in Project Cost Performance: The Netherlands versus Worldwide , 2012, 1307.2181.

[2]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Looking back to see the future: building nuclear power plants in Europe , 2012 .

[3]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project , 2009 .

[4]  Harvey Maylor.  Project Management, fourth edition , 2010 .

[5]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames , 2012 .

[6]  Denise Bower,et al.  What risks are common to or amplified in programmes: Evidence from UK public sector infrastructure schemes , 2011 .

[7]  Allan A. Warrack,et al.  MEGAPROJECT DECISION MAKING Lessons and Strategies , 1993 .

[8]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Different Cost Performance: Different Determinants? The Case of Cost Overruns in Dutch Transport Infrastructure Projects , 2012, 1307.2179.

[9]  R. Müller,et al.  The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project , 2007 .

[10]  Petr Klusáček,et al.  THE EXPANSION OF COAL MINING IN THE DEPRESSION AREAS — A WAY TO DEVELOPMENT? , 2014 .

[11]  James Odeck.  Do reforms reduce the magnitudes of cost overruns in road projects? Statistical evidence from Norway , 2014 .

[12]  Procedures for Dealing with Optimism Bias in Transport Planning , 2004 .

[13]  Gateways, Corridors And Competitiveness: An Evaluation Of Trans-European Networks And Lessons For Canada , 2007 .

[14]  Werner Rothengatter,et al.  Big Decisions, Big Risks: Improving Accountability in Mega Projects , 2002 .

[15]  Sung Ho Park,et al.  Whole life performance assessment: critical success factors , 2009 .

[16]  A. Anas.  The optimal pricing, finance and supply of urban transportation in general equilibrium: A theoretical exposition , 2012 .

[17]  Anandasivakumar Ekambaram,et al.  Megaprojects-Challenges and Lessons Learned , 2013 .

[18]  D. Evers,et al.  Explaining Governance in Five Mega-City Regions: Rethinking the Role of Hierarchy and Government , 2013 .

[19]  S. Verweij.  Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis , 2013 .

[20]  Alan Barrett,et al.  Questioning the Waste Hierarchy: The Case of a Region with a Low Population Density , 1997 .

[21]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[22]  Greg Marsden,et al.  Transport, economic competitiveness and competition: A city perspective , 2015 .

[23]  Ruggero Golini,et al.  Adoption of project management practices: The impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations , 2015 .

[24]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? , 2003 .

[25]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Special Purpose Entities in Megaprojects: Empty Boxes or Real Companies? , 2017 .

[26]  J. Newig,et al.  Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany , 2015 .

[27]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice , 2008 .

[28]  Dejan Makovšek,et al.  Systematic construction risk, cost estimation mechanism and unit price movements , 2014 .

[29]  Mendel Giezen,et al.  Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning , 2012 .

[30]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? , 2004, 1304.4476.

[31]  Chris Leach,et al.  Introduction to statistics: A nonparametric approach for the social sciences , 1979 .

[32]  Ιωάννης Κ. Καλδέλλης,et al.  Comparing recent views of public attitude on wind energy, photovoltaic and small hydro applications , 2015 .

[33]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Systems Engineering to improve the governance in complex project environments , 2014 .

[34]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[35]  Daniel J. Graham,et al.  The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence , 2013 .

[36]  P. Gellert,et al.  Mega‐projects as displacements* , 2003 .

[37]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Small modular reactors: A comprehensive overview of their economics and strategic aspects , 2014 .

[38]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision-making , 2015 .

[39]  S. K. Poddar.  Managing projects in a global environment: What does it take to facilitate projects in several time zones away? , 2010 .

[40]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management , 2015 .

[41]  A. Mol,et al.  Public participation and trust in nuclear power development in China , 2013 .

[42]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  Shankar Sankaran.  Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, strategies and practices for success , 2016 .

[44]  Andreas Lindén,et al.  Community attachment and municipal economy: Public attitudes towards wind power in a local context , 2015 .

[45]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods , 2015 .

[46]  Mitchell J. Mergenthaler.  Introduction to statistics: A nonparametric approach , 1976 .

[47]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Adding value to the decision-making process of mega projects: Fostering strategic ambiguity, redundancy, and resilience , 2015 .

[48]  Herman Mooi,et al.  How do contract types and incentives matter to project performance , 2016 .

[49]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management , 2014 .

[50]  Ray Bert.  Book Review: Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success , by Edward W. Merrow. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2011 , 2011 .

[51]  Ashly Pinnington,et al.  Exploring the Value of Project Management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success , 2014 .

[52]  Ashly Pinnington,et al.  National culture differences in project management: Comparing British and Arab project managers' perceptions of different planning areas , 2013 .

[53]  B. Wee.  Large Infrastructure Projects: A Review of the Quality of Demand Forecasts and Cost Estimations , 2007 .

[54]  P. Fitsilis,et al.  Adoption of Project Management Practices in Public Organizations , 2014 .

[55]  Marko Mäkilouko.  Coping with multicultural projects: the leadership styles of Finnish project managers , 2004 .

[56]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL ESCALATION AND EXIT: LESSONS FROM THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT , 1993 .

[57]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[58]  S. Asmervik,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk. An Anatomy of Ambition , 2004 .

[59]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Corruption in Public projects and Megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! , 2017 .

[60]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Social Site Characterisation for CO2 Storage Operations to Inform Public Engagement in Poland and Scotland , 2013 .

[61]  Jie Huang,et al.  Handling social risks in government-driven mega project: An empirical case study from West China , 2016 .

[62]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of Transportation , 2005, 1303.6654.

[63]  Susan S. Fainstein,et al.  The New Mega‐Projects: Genesis and Impacts , 2008 .

[64]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[65]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects , 2008 .

[66]  John Nellthorp,et al.  Ex Post Appraisal: What Lessons Can Be Learnt from EU Cohesion Funded Transport Projects , 2012 .

[67]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  The causes of project failure , 1990 .

[68]  George Ofori,et al.  Research on cross‐cultural leadership and management in construction: a review and directions for future research , 2009 .

[69]  Marcel Veenswijk,et al.  Managing public–private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design , 2008 .

[70]  D. Graham.  Agglomeration, Productivity and Transport Investment , 2007 .

[71]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right , 2006, ArXiv.

[72]  Lavagnon A. Ika.  Project Success as a Topic in Project Management Journals , 2009 .

[73]  Pg Wright,et al.  Mega transport projects—Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Findings from the OMEGA research programme , 2013 .

[74]  Xuefei Ren,et al.  Urban governance, mega-projects and scalar transformations in China and India , 2013 .

[75]  K. Aaltonen,et al.  Stakeholder salience in global projects , 2008 .

[76]  R. Knowles,et al.  Evaluation of wider economic impacts of light rail investment on cities , 2016 .

[77]  B. Flyvbjerg.  What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview , 2014, 1409.0003.

[78]  J. Berechman,et al.  Incorporating Risk of Cost Overruns into Transportation Capital Projects Decision-Making , 2011 .

[79]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[80]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Identifying Preferences For Public Transport Investments Under A Constrained Budget , 2015 .

[81]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[82]  Ian F. Alexander,et al.  Understanding project sociology by modeling stakeholders , 2004, IEEE Software.

[83]  Juani Swart,et al.  Identifying knowledge boundaries: the case of networked projects , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[84]  Paul M. Goodrum,et al.  Effective Project Scoping Practices to Improve On-Time and On-Budget Delivery of Highway Projects , 2016 .

[85]  D. Banister,et al.  Transport infrastructure investment , 2003 .

[86]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.