Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal.

[1]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis. , 1999, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[2]  M Blettner,et al.  Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A R Jadad,et al.  Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  S. Thacker,et al.  Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  E. Williams,et al.  Information for Readers: The JAMA 1997 Editorial Peer Review Audit , 1998 .

[7]  A. Jadad,et al.  How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  M. Henderson,et al.  Using Systematic Reviews in Clinical Education , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  E. Williams,et al.  Information for Readers: The JAMA 1996 Editorial Peer Review Audit , 1997 .

[10]  P Huston,et al.  Cochrane Collaboration helping unravel tangled web woven by international research. , 1996, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[11]  A. Jadad,et al.  Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[13]  A D Oxman,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles , 1994, BMJ.

[14]  S Greenland,et al.  Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  E. Lawson,et al.  Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  J. R. Gilbert,et al.  Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? , 1994, JAMA.

[17]  Jerome P. Kassirer,et al.  Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  S. Goodman,et al.  Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  J. Kassirer.  Dissemination of Medical Information: A Journal's Role , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Lau,et al.  Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  Kanchele Cc,et al.  Reasons for rejection of articles vor publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde in 1990 , 1991 .

[22]  M. J. Ackerman,et al.  Dissemination Of Medical Information , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. The First International Conference on Image Management and Communication in Patient Care: Implementation and Impact.

[23]  S B Thacker,et al.  Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration. , 1988, JAMA.

[24]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Ware,et al.  The futility index. An approach to the cost-effective termination of randomized clinical trials. , 1985, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  Cheryl Iverson,et al.  American Medical Association manual of style , 1989 .

[28]  D. Berry.  Monitoring accumulating data in a clinical trial. , 1989, Biometrics.

[29]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .