Convergence Tests for Transdimensional Markov Chains in Geoscience Imaging

Classic inversion methods adjust a model with a predefined number of parameters to the observed data. With transdimensional inversion algorithms such as the reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (rjMCMC), it is possible to vary this number during the inversion and to interpret the observations in a more flexible way. Geoscience imaging applications use this behaviour to automatically adjust model resolution to the inhomogeneities of the investigated system, while keeping the model parameters on an optimal level. The rjMCMC algorithm produces an ensemble as result, a set of model realizations, which together represent the posterior probability distribution of the investigated problem. The realizations are evolved via sequential updates from a randomly chosen initial solution and converge toward the target posterior distribution of the inverse problem. Up to a point in the chain, the realizations may be strongly biased by the initial model, and must be discarded from the final ensemble. With convergence assessment techniques, this point in the chain can be identified. Transdimensional MCMC methods produce ensembles that are not suitable for classic convergence assessment techniques because of the changes in parameter numbers. To overcome this hurdle, three solutions are introduced to convert model realizations to a common dimensionality while maintaining the statistical characteristics of the ensemble. A scalar, a vector and a matrix representation for models is presented, inferred from tomographic subsurface investigations, and three classic convergence assessment techniques are applied on them. It is shown that appropriately chosen scalar conversions of the models could retain similar statistical ensemble properties as geologic projections created by rasterization.

[1]  D. Hand,et al.  Bayesian partition modelling , 2002 .

[2]  Yalchin Efendiev,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification for flows in heterogeneous porous media using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2010 .

[3]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  Smart pilot points using reversible‐jump Markov‐chain Monte Carlo , 2016 .

[4]  Muhammad Sahimi,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches , 1995 .

[5]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo conver-gence diagnostics: a comparative review , 1996 .

[6]  Satish Karra,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo With Graph-Based Subsurface Flow and Transport Models , 2018 .

[7]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty of Complex Earth Systems in Metric Space , 2015 .

[8]  P. Bayer,et al.  Fracture Network Characterization Using Stress‐Based Tomography , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[9]  G. Böhm,et al.  A laboratory study of tracer tomography , 2013, Hydrogeology Journal.

[10]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Effects of atmospheric light scattering on spectroscopic observations of greenhouse gases from space: Validation of PPDF-based CO_2 retrievals from GOSAT , 2012 .

[11]  M. Jalali Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Behavior of Conductive Fractures using a Hybrid Finite Difference – Displacement Discontinuity Method , 2013 .

[12]  Paolo Giudici,et al.  Nonparametric Convergence Assessment for MCMC Model Selection , 2003 .

[13]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[14]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion , 2012 .

[15]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Transdimensional inference in the geosciences , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[17]  A. Jardani,et al.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm for the characterization of hydraulic conductivity from the heat tracing data , 2016 .

[18]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Steady-state analysis of cross-hole pneumatic injection tests in unsaturated fractured tuff , 2003 .

[19]  Jan Dettmer,et al.  Trans-dimensional matched-field geoacoustic inversion with hierarchical error models and interacting Markov chains. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[21]  T. LaForce,et al.  Bayesian Reservoir History Matching Considering Model and Parameter Uncertainties , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[22]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[23]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Growth of exfoliation joints and near-surface stress orientations inferred from fractographic markings observed in the upper Aar valley (Swiss Alps) , 2014 .

[24]  A. Malinverno,et al.  Receiver function inversion by trans‐dimensional Monte Carlo sampling , 2010 .

[25]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  Possible biases induced by MCMC convergence diagnostics , 1999 .

[26]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  A Fast Approximation for Seismic Inverse Modeling: Adaptive Spatial Resampling , 2017, Mathematical Geosciences.

[27]  V. Johnson Studying Convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms Using Coupled Sample Paths , 1996 .

[28]  Peter Bayer,et al.  Synthetic fracture network characterization with transdimensional inversion , 2017 .

[29]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[30]  William A. Link,et al.  On thinning of chains in MCMC , 2012 .

[31]  Matthew Fox,et al.  Abrupt changes in the rate of Andean Plateau uplift from reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo inversion of river profiles , 2014 .

[32]  V. Johnson A Coupling-Regeneration Scheme for Diagnosing Convergence in Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms , 1998 .

[33]  K. Cowles,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis software for Gibbs sampling output , 1995 .

[34]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Analysis of tracer tomography using temporal moments of tracer breakthrough curves , 2009 .

[35]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm , 2009 .

[36]  Stan E. Dosso,et al.  Efficient trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion for geoacoustic profile estimation , 2014 .

[37]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[38]  Masyhur Irsyam,et al.  Imaging architecture of the Jakarta Basin, Indonesia with transdimensional inversion of seismic noise , 2016 .

[39]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .