Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology

In learning to perceive and produce speech, children master complex language-specific patterns. Daunting language-specific variation is found both in the segmental domain and in the domain of prosody and intonation. This article reviews the challenges posed by results in phonetic typology and sociolinguistics for the theory of language acquisition. It argues that categories are initiated bottom-up from statistical modesin use of the phonetic space, and sketches how exemplar theory can be used to model the updating of categories once they are initiated. It also argues that bottom-upinitiation of categories is successful thanks to the perceptionproduction loop operating in the speech community. The behavior of this loop means that the superficial statistical properties of speech available to the infant indirectly reflect the contrastiveness and discriminability of categories in the adult grammar. The article also argues that the developing system is refined using internal feedback from type statistics over the lexicon, once the lexicon is well-developed. The application of type statistics to a system initiated with surface statistics does not cause a fundamental reorganization of the system. Instead, it exploits confluences across levels of representation which characterize human language and make bootstrapping possible.

[1]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[2]  R. N. Indah Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.

[3]  Ilse Lehiste,et al.  An Acoustic – Phonetic Study of Internal Open Juncture , 1959 .

[4]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[5]  David Crystal,et al.  Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English , 1969 .

[6]  J. Lehtonen Aspects of quantity in standard Finnish , 1970 .

[7]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. Berinstein,et al.  WPP, No. 47: A Cross-linguistic Study on the Perception and Production of Stress , 1979 .

[9]  Wayne A. Lea,et al.  Trends in Speech Recognition , 1980 .

[10]  R. Schulman,et al.  Non-distinctive features and their use , 1983 .

[11]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[12]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[13]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Beckman Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[17]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[18]  Roger K. Moore Computer Speech and Language , 1986 .

[19]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[20]  Kenneth Ward Church Phonological parsing in speech recognition , 1987 .

[21]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[22]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants , 1988, Cognition.

[23]  J B Pierrehumbert,et al.  Categories of tonal alignment in English. , 1989, Phonetica.

[24]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[25]  Malcah Yaeger-Dror,et al.  Lexical Classes in Montreal French: The Case of (ε:) , 1992 .

[26]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[27]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[28]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Generalized alignment , 1993 .

[29]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert Prosody, intonation, and speech technology , 1993 .

[30]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[31]  O. Engstrand,et al.  Durational Correlates of Quantity in Swedish, Finnish and Estonian: Cross-Language Evidence for a Theory of Adaptive Dispersion , 1994 .

[32]  W. Labov Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[33]  K. D. de Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  András Kornai,et al.  ANALYTIC MODELS IN PHONOLOGY , 1996 .

[37]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Role of F0 and amplitude in the perception of intervocalic glottal stops. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  Marilyn M. Vihman,et al.  Phonological Development , 2014 .

[39]  U. Kleinhenz Interfaces in Phonology , 1996 .

[40]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Discriminability and perceptual weighting of some acoustic cues to speech perception by 3-year-olds. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[41]  Malcah Yaeger-Dror,et al.  Phonetic evidence for the evolution of lexical classes , 1996 .

[42]  Anne Christophe,et al.  Selecting word order: the Rhytmic Activation Principle , 1996 .

[43]  J. Mehler,et al.  A destressing deafness in French , 1997 .

[44]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Synthesizing Allophonic Glottalization , 1997 .

[45]  A. Cutler,et al.  Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish , 1997 .

[46]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[47]  Sarmad Hussain,et al.  Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu , 1998 .

[48]  J. McQueen Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[49]  R. Krakow,et al.  Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Morphemes, Phonetics and Lexical Items: The Case of the Scottish Vowel Length Rule. , 1999 .

[51]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  Valérie Hazan,et al.  The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6-12 , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[53]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Learning Phonemes Without Minimal Pairs , 2000 .

[55]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  Investigating universals of sound change: the effect of vowel height and duration on the development of distinctive nasalization , 2000 .

[56]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[57]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns , 2000 .

[58]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Neural plasticity revealed in perceptual training of a Japanese adult listener to learn american /l-r/ contrast: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[59]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[60]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Phonetic structures of Aleut , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[61]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[62]  William Hallett Ham,et al.  Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Geminate Timing , 2001 .

[63]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[64]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[65]  S. Frisch,et al.  The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic , 2001 .

[66]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Spoken Word Access Processes , 2001 .

[67]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[68]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[69]  T. L. Face,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon (review) , 2002 .

[70]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[71]  James D. Harnsberger,et al.  Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[72]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production , 2002 .

[73]  Richard Wright,et al.  Prosody and phonetic variability: Lessons learned from acoustic model clustering , 2003 .

[74]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic catergories: an integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories , 2003 .

[75]  D. Swingley,et al.  Phonetic Detail in the Developing Lexicon , 2003, Language and speech.

[76]  J. Hay Causes and Consequences of Word Structure , 2003 .

[77]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  Acoustic model clustering based on syllable structure , 2003, Comput. Speech Lang..

[78]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[79]  Warren Harrison,et al.  In This Issue , 2004, Software Quality Journal.

[80]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon , 2004 .

[81]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[82]  S. Goldinger THE ROLE OF PERCEPTUAL EPISODES IN LEXICAL PROCESSING , 2022 .