Global change impacts on ecosystem services: a spatially explicit assessment for Europe

The widely reported impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity pose a threat also to the supply of ecosystem services. Ecosystem services (ES) arise when ecological structures or functions contribute toward meeting a human demand. Global change is impacting biodiversity and ecosystems properties and is therefore likely to affect the supply of ES and, consequently, human well-being. Assessing the possible bio-physical impacts of the ongoing and future changes in climate is relevant for designing mitigation and adaptation policies. Yet undergoing a comprehensive climate impact assessment continues to be a demanding research challenge due to the large knowledge gaps, for instance on impact areas such as the consequences on ecosystem services.\n\n Here we present a preliminary assessment of the changes in ES supply as a function of projected changes in climate and land use / land cover (LULC). The assessment is carried out for the mainland of the 28 Member States (MS) of the European Union (EU-28). The focus of the analysis is on regulating ecosystem services, which are directly dependent on the proper functioning of ecosystems, they are not traded on markets so that their contribution to human well-being is more difficult to assess. We present an assessment of changes in ES supply for three regulating services: air quality regulation, soil erosion control, and water flow regulation. The assessment was carried out under the IPCC SRES A1B climate change scenario. Changes were expressed as a positive or negative percentage variation, relative to the present situation. Land conversion was found to have a much stronger impact on ES provision than climate change. When considering both climate change and LULC change the expected variation ranged between -100% and +100%. These results are explained by the key role that LULC plays in the delivery of regulating ES. The sensitivity of ES to climate change is smaller than that to LULC change, with variations ranging at the most between -27% and +27%. However, these changes are the most relevant to assess, for instance, potential economic impacts of climate change on the provision of ES. There are clearly major challenges to address within the area of climate-change impacts, yet the scale of global change requires prompt actions to mitigate or adapt to the new conditions. This work, therefore, represents perforce a preliminary spatially explicit assessment. Further research is needed not only to expand the analysis to other ES, but also to incorporate processes and scaling properties of the systems considered as they become available, and to account for spatial dependencies.

[1]  Marco Bindi,et al.  Climatic changes and associated impacts in the Mediterranean resulting from a 2°C global warming , 2009 .

[2]  J. Terradas,et al.  Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The Case of Urban Forests in Barcelona, Spain , 2014, AMBIO.

[3]  Amit K. Srivastava,et al.  Climate Impacts in Europe - The JRC PESETA II Project , 2014 .

[4]  Panos Panagos,et al.  The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe , 2015 .

[5]  J. Cain Planning improvements in natural resource management. Guidelines for using Bayesian networks to support the planning and management of development programmes in the water sector and beyond , 2001 .

[6]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Marta Schuhmacher,et al.  Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Walter D. Fisher On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity , 1958 .

[9]  J. Blum,et al.  Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The Case of Urban Forests in Barcelona, Spain , 2017 .

[10]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[11]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Modeling land use decisions with Bayesian networks: Spatially explicit analysis of driving forces on land use change , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Assessment of coastal protection as an ecosystem service in Europe , 2013 .

[13]  D. D. Groot Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making , 1992, Polar Record.

[14]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Sandra Johnson,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[16]  D. Sarigiannis,et al.  Total exposure to airborne particulate matter in cities: the effect of biomass combustion. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  M. Pulido‐Velazquez,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian Networks as a Decision Support Tool for assessing Climate Change impacts on highly stressed groundwater systems , 2013 .

[18]  B. Kløve,et al.  Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems , 2014 .

[19]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[20]  X. Querol,et al.  Atmospheric PM and volatile organic compounds released 1 from Mediterranean shrubland wildfires 2 3 , 2014 .

[21]  J. Honrado,et al.  Ecosystem Services: The Opportunities of Rewilding in Europe , 2015 .

[22]  Vandecasteele Ine,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010 , 2015 .

[23]  G. Destouni,et al.  Interacting effects of change in climate, human population, land use, and water use on biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2015 .

[24]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil Erosion Research Methods , 1994 .

[25]  E. Ozdemiroglu,et al.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: the Quantitative Assessment , 2011 .

[26]  Fayçal Bouraoui,et al.  A simplified parameterization of the monthly topsoil water budget , 2008 .

[27]  X. Querol,et al.  Atmospheric PM and volatile organic compounds released from Mediterranean shrubland wildfires , 2014 .

[28]  L. Brander Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[29]  S. Navrud,et al.  Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands , 2012 .

[30]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU , 2014 .

[31]  J. V. Minnen,et al.  Climate change in Europe. 1. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[32]  Russell Richards,et al.  Bayesian belief modeling of climate change impacts for informing regional adaptation options , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation , 2015 .

[34]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[35]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.

[36]  R. Bruins,et al.  The role of the atmosphere in the provision of ecosystem services. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Panos Panagos,et al.  Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale , 2015 .

[38]  Stijn Janssen,et al.  Improving local air quality in cities: to tree or not to tree? , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[39]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Baranzelli Claudia,et al.  The Reference Scenario in the LUISA platform – Updated configuration 2014Towards a Common Baseline Scenario for EC Impact Assessment procedures , 2014 .

[41]  F. Müller,et al.  Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification , 2014 .

[42]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy , 2013 .

[43]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Integrating Expert Knowledge into Mapping Ecosystem Services Trade-offs for Sustainable Forest Management , 2013 .

[44]  Ana Iglesias,et al.  Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Kenneth G. Renard,et al.  Soil Erosion: Processes, Prediction, Measurement, and Control , 2002 .

[46]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  ESTIMAP: A GIS-BASED MODEL TO MAP ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2014 .

[47]  M. Friedl,et al.  A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data , 2009 .

[48]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[49]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States , 2006 .

[50]  Emmanuel S. Gritti,et al.  Towards European climate risk surfaces: the extent and distribution of analogous and non-analogous climates 1931–2100 , 2006 .

[51]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[52]  Emmanuel S. Gritti,et al.  Quantifying components of risk for European woody species under climate change , 2006 .

[53]  Steven Broekx,et al.  A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[54]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Predicting impacts of increased CO₂ and climate change on the water cycle and water quality in the semiarid James River Basin of the Midwestern USA. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[55]  B. Yerima,et al.  Physical and economic consequences of climate change in select-countries of Sub-Sahara Africa , 2015 .

[56]  F. Rey,et al.  Plant root traits affecting the resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion , 2012 .

[57]  E. Cantoral-Uriza,et al.  Assessment of Water Supply as an Ecosystem Service in a Rural-Urban Watershed in Southwestern Mexico City , 2012, Environmental Management.

[58]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  M. Zalewski,et al.  Sustainable floodplain management for flood prevention and water quality improvement , 2015, Natural Hazards.