Teacher evaluation of student ability: what roles do teacher gender, student gender, and their interaction play?

Background: Recent decades have been marked by an extensive movement to analyze bias in people’s thinking, especially in gender-related issues. Studies have addressed the question of gender bias in classrooms on different levels—the use of gender in books, learning opportunities determined by students’ gender, or teachers’ gender preferences. Purpose: In this study, we aim to answer the question of whether and under which circumstances the interaction between teacher gender and student gender positively or negatively influences teachers’ evaluations of students’ performance, while controlling for objective measures of students’ performance. For instance, it could be possible that a teacher with the same gender as a student evaluates the student as better than opposite-gender students, independent of their objective performance. Sample: The sample consisted of n > 1,500 Finnish 6th grade students (Mage= 12.67) and their respective class teachers. Design and methods: Students completed several academic skills tests, including a mathematical thinking test, reading comprehension test, and scientific reasoning test. Furthermore, teachers provided their evaluation of each student, evaluating students’ performance in different school subjects and answering questions regarding their probability of academic success. To test whether the teacher-student gender interaction had an effect on the criterion variable, i.e. teachers’ evaluation of the students’ performance, multilevel analyses accounting for between- and within-class effects were applied. Thereby, the effect of students’ objective performance on teachers’ evaluation of the students and main effects of gender were controlled for as covariates. Results: The main results indicated that the interaction between student and teacher gender did not influence teachers’ evaluation of the students. However, regardless of their gender, teachers tended to evaluate girls as better than boys in first language performance (i.e. Finnish language) and potential for success in school. Teacher gender did not influence the evaluation. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the interaction between teacher and student gender is unlikely to be a source of possible bias in the evaluations of students in the Finnish educational system.

[1]  Sarah Joyce.  Gender Differences in Student-Teacher Interactions in Some Grade Seven Mathematics and Language Arts Classrooms in Canada and Cuba: A Pilot Study , 1991 .

[2]  Markku Niemivirta,et al.  Assessing Learning-to-Learn A FRAMEWORK , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Gender bias in female elementary teachers' perceptions of the scientific ability of students , 1992 .

[4]  Kathryn Dindia,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Perspective on Sex Equity in the Classroom , 2004 .

[5]  T. Dee.  The Why Chromosome: How a Teacher's Gender Affects Boys and Girls , 2006 .

[6]  J. Lehto,et al.  Hierarchy rating as a measure of text macroprocessing : Relationship with working memory and school achievement , 1998 .

[7]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in teacher‐student interactions in science classrooms , 1990 .

[8]  T. Dee.  Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement , 2005, The Journal of Human Resources.

[9]  National survey of reading comprehension in Finland , 2001 .

[10]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[11]  S. Zaher.  Gender and Curriculum in the School Room. , 1996 .

[12]  C. Hatzichristou,et al.  Teacher gender‐related influences in Greek schools , 1999 .

[13]  John M Robst,et al.  The effect of gender composition of faculty on student retention , 1998 .

[14]  M. Shayer,et al.  HAS PIAGET'S CONSTRUCT OF FORMAL OPERATIONAL THINKING ANY UTILITY? , 1979 .

[15]  Rosalie J. Hall,et al.  Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership , 2005 .

[16]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Universals and Specificities in the Structure and Development of Quantitative-relational Thought: A Cross-cultural Study in Greece and India , 1996 .

[17]  W. Hays.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[18]  J. A. Bennett,et al.  Teachers' Attributions and Beliefs in Relation to Gender and Success of Students. , 1994 .

[19]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[20]  Del Siegle,et al.  Gender Differences in Teacher and Student Perceptions of Gifted Students' Ability and Effort , 1998 .

[21]  David Eichelberger,et al.  Handbook Of Psychological Testing , 2016 .

[22]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics (5th Edition) , 2006 .

[23]  P. Sahlberg.  PISA in Finland: An Education Miracle or an Obstacle to Change? , 2018, Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal.

[24]  P. Kline.  The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[25]  J. Piaget,et al.  The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .

[26]  Erum Qazi,et al.  Still Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys in School and What We Can Do About It - David & Myra Sadker & Karen R. Zittleman (2009) , 2014 .

[27]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  The educational attainment of young women: Role model effects of female high school faculty , 1999, Demography.

[28]  Andreas Landmann,et al.  Unmasking the Myth of the Same-Sex Teacher Advantage , 2011 .

[29]  S. Jak,et al.  Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher-student relationship quality. , 2012, Journal of school psychology.

[30]  K. Sund,et al.  Is the Gender Gap in School Performance Affected by the Sex of the Teacher , 2008 .

[31]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[32]  Descriptors Developmental,et al.  Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists , 1999 .

[33]  Lee Jussim,et al.  Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  J. Eccles,et al.  In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  S. Field,et al.  No more failures : ten steps to equity in education , 2007 .

[36]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[37]  Andreas Demetriou,et al.  The development of quantitative-relational abilities from childhood to adolescence: Structure, scaling, and individual differences , 1991 .

[38]  Elena L. Grigorenko,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test in Three International Samples , 2001 .

[39]  David Sadker,et al.  Closing the Gender Gap--Again! Just When Educators Thought It Was No Longer An Issue, Gender Bias Is Back In A New Context. , 2005 .

[40]  Robert C. Haight,et al.  The effect of same-gender teacher assignment on student achievement in the elementary and secondary grades: Evidence from panel data , 2013 .

[41]  R. Hinde,et al.  Gender‐typing1 in young children: Preferences, behaviour and cultural differences , 1993 .