Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration in oncologic surgery: A call for artificial intelligence and machine learning

In this review, we aim to assess the current state of science in relation to the integration of patient‐generated health data (PGHD) and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) into routine clinical care with a focus on surgical oncology populations. We will also describe the critical role of artificial intelligence and machine‐learning methodology in the efficient translation of PGHD, PROs, and traditional outcome measures into meaningful patient care models.

[1]  Anna Lee,et al.  Assessment of Parking Fees at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Treatment Centers. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[2]  B. V. van Munster,et al.  Postoperative recovery of accelerometer-based physical activity in older cancer patients. , 2020, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives , 2020, Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics.

[4]  J. Blazeby,et al.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[5]  R. Engelbert,et al.  Physiotherapy With Telerehabilitation in Patients With Complicated Postoperative Recovery After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Feasibility Study , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  J. Batsis,et al.  A feasibility study of an unsupervised, pre-operative exercise program for adults with lung cancer. , 2020, European journal of cancer care.

[7]  N. Demartines,et al.  Gains and limitations of a connected tracking solution in the perioperative follow-up of colorectal surgery patients. , 2020, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery. , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[9]  M. Nagino,et al.  How Many Steps Per Day are Necessary to Prevent Postoperative Complications Following Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgeries for Malignancy? , 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  K. Mandl,et al.  SMART Markers: collecting patient-generated health data as a standardized property of health information technology. , 2020, NPJ digital medicine.

[11]  T. Robinson,et al.  Wearable Technology-A Pilot Study to Define "Normal" Postoperative Recovery Trajectories. , 2019, The Journal of surgical research.

[12]  Rachel M. Barkley,et al.  Feasibility of low‐cost accelerometers in measuring functional recovery after major oncologic surgery , 2019, Journal of surgical oncology.

[13]  R. Warsame,et al.  Patient Reported Outcomes Have Arrived: A Practical Overview for Clinicians in Using Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology. , 2019, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  A. Ejaz,et al.  Novel Machine Learning Approach to Identify Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Super-Utilization of Medicare Expenditure Following Surgery. , 2019, JAMA surgery.

[15]  A. Dicker,et al.  Big Data From Small Devices: The Future of Smartphones in Oncology. , 2019, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[16]  Frédéric Ehrler,et al.  Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data to Facilitate Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Scoping Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  R. Alloway,et al.  Telemedicine Based Remote Home Monitoring After Liver Transplantation: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[18]  G. Demiris,et al.  Patient generated health data use in clinical practice: A systematic review. , 2019, Nursing outlook.

[19]  J. Blazeby,et al.  Developing a real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following cancer-related surgery , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[20]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Modeling Biobehavioral Rhythms with Passive Sensing in the Wild , 2019, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[21]  Dwight E Heron,et al.  Digital Era of Mobile Communications and Smartphones: A Novel Analysis of Patient Comprehension of Cancer-Related Information Available Through Mobile Applications* , 2019, Cancer investigation.

[22]  Jessica S. Ancker,et al.  Early Adopters of Patient-Generated Health Data Upload in an Electronic Patient Portal , 2019, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[23]  Elizabeth C. Lorenzi,et al.  Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[24]  B. B. Zaidan,et al.  Real-Time Medical Systems Based on Human Biometric Steganography: a Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[25]  C. Royse The patient's surgical journey and consequences of poor recovery. , 2018, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[26]  C. Royse,et al.  A matter of perspective - Objective versus subjective outcomes in the assessment of quality of recovery. , 2018, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[27]  John P. Sullivan,et al.  A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[28]  J. Goble The Potential Effect of the 21st Century Cures Act on Drug Development , 2018, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[29]  E. Basch,et al.  Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care. , 2018, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[30]  J. Su,et al.  AIR Louisville: Addressing Asthma With Technology, Crowdsourcing, Cross-Sector Collaboration, And Policy. , 2018, Health affairs.

[31]  Amy M. Bauer,et al.  Acceptability of mHealth augmentation of Collaborative Care: A mixed methods pilot study. , 2018, General hospital psychiatry.

[32]  Francis Lévi,et al.  Home-Based e-Health Platform for Multidimensional Telemonitoring of Symptoms, Body Weight, Sleep, and Circadian Activity: Relevance for Chronomodulated Administration of Irinotecan, Fluorouracil-Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin at Home-Results From a Pilot Study. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[33]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  2017 Roadmap for Innovation-ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Information Quality Challenges of Patient-Generated Data in Clinical Practice , 2017, Front. Public Health.

[35]  S. Sentovich,et al.  Wireless Monitoring Program of Patient-Centered Outcomes and Recovery Before and After Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[36]  Adrian P. Lauf,et al.  Parent Education is Changing: A Review of Smartphone Apps , 2017, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[37]  M. Kris,et al.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment , 2017, JAMA.

[38]  G. Stukenborg,et al.  A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery , 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[39]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Patient-Reported Symptom Interference as a Measure of Postsurgery Functional Recovery in Lung Cancer. , 2016, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[40]  E. Basch,et al.  Electronic patient-reported outcomes from home in patients recovering from major gynecologic cancer surgery: A prospective study measuring symptoms and health-related quality of life. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[41]  Antonio Soriano Payá,et al.  Using machine learning methods for predicting inhospital mortality in patients undergoing open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[42]  Carolyn Petersen,et al.  Patient-generated health data: a pathway to enhanced long-term cancer survivorship , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[43]  E. Basch,et al.  Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[44]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[45]  Riccardo Miotto,et al.  Translational bioinformatics in the era of real-time biomedical, health care and wellness data streams , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[46]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Accurately Measure the Value of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[47]  Aaron J. Dawes,et al.  Wireless Technology to Track Surgical Patients after Discharge: A Pilot Study , 2015, The American surgeon.

[48]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Symptom recovery after thoracic surgery: Measuring patient-reported outcomes with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[49]  K. Bilimoria,et al.  Patient satisfaction, outcomes, and the need for cancer-specific quality metrics. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  K. Lu,et al.  Perioperative trajectory of patient reported symptoms: a pilot study in gynecologic oncology patients. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[51]  David Cella,et al.  The Role of Technical Advances in the Adoption and Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in Clinical Care , 2015, Medical care.

[52]  G. Fried,et al.  Short-stay surgery: what really happens after discharge? , 2014, Surgery.

[53]  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou,et al.  Predictors of eHealth Usage: Insights on The Digital Divide From the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012 , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[54]  Emilia Farcas,et al.  Identifying early dehydration risk with home-based sensors during radiation treatment: a feasibility study on patients with head and neck cancer. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[55]  J. Dearani,et al.  Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[56]  E. Basch,et al.  A prospective study of the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based, electronic patient-reported outcome system in assessing patient recovery after major gynecologic cancer surgery. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[57]  Carey L. Thaldorf,et al.  A Method for Understanding Some Consequences of Bringing Patient-Generated Data into Health Care Delivery , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[58]  N. Kearney,et al.  Patients ’ perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system ( ASyMS © ) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity , 2009 .

[59]  David Artz,et al.  Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  A. Ejaz,et al.  Can We Improve Prediction of Adverse Surgical Outcomes? Development of a Surgical Complexity Score Using A Novel Machine Learning Technique. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[61]  K. Itani,et al.  Association of Postoperative Infection With Risk of Long-term Infection and Mortality. , 2019, JAMA surgery.

[62]  Maria M. Psiha Efficient Health Information Management Based on Patient-Generated Digital Data. , 2017, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[63]  William G. Adams,et al.  TLC-Asthma: An Integrated Information System for Patient-centered Monitoring, Case Management, and Point-of-Care Decision Support , 2003, AMIA.