A BAYESIAN MODEL FOR PORTFOLIO SELECTION AND REVISION

IN PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS, the basic setting is that of an individual or a group of individuals making inferences and decisions in the face of uncertainty about future security prices and related variables. Formal models for decision making under uncertainty require inputs such as probability distributions to reflect a decision maker's uncertainty about future events and utility functions to reflect a decision maker's preferences among possible consequences [30]. Moreover, when a series of interrelated decisions is to be made over time, the decision maker should (1) revise his probability distributions as new information is obtained and (2) take into account the effect of the current decision on future decisions. In terms of formal models of the decision-making process, probability revision can be accomplished by using Bayes' theorem and the interrelationships among the decisions can be taken into consideration by using dynamic programming to determine optimal decisions. Since portfolio selection and revision involves a series of interrelated decisions made over time, formal portfolio models should, insofar as possible, incorporate these features. A search of the extensive literature concerning portfolio models indicates, however, that such models have ignored one or both of these features. Since Markowitz [18] developed his original model of portfolio selection, a considerable amount of work has been conducted in the area of mathematical portfolio analysis, and much of this work is summarized by Sharpe [31] and Smith [33]. Although the emphasis in portfolio analysis has been primarily on single-period models and portfolio selection, multiperiod models and portfolio revision are investigated by Tobin [35], Smith [32], Mossin [21], Pogue [22], Chen, Jen, and Zionts [3], and Hakansson [13, 14]. In addition, general multiperiod models of consumption-investment decisions are developed by Hakansson [10, 11, 12], Merton [19], Samuelson [29], Fama [6], and Meyer [20]. However, it is generally assumed that the probability distributions of interest are completely specified and that they are unaffected by new information, implying that the portfolio revision models do not involve probability revision over time. Bayesian models have received virtually no attention in the portfolio literature. Mao and Siirndal [17] present a simple, discrete, single-period Bayesian model in which the returns from securities are related to the level of general business activity and information is obtained concerning business conditions. Kalymon [16] develops a model

[1]  H. Levy,et al.  The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk1 , 1975 .

[2]  J. L. Bicksler,et al.  Methodology in finance-investments , 1973 .

[3]  S. J. Press,et al.  Applied Multivariate Analysis. , 1973 .

[4]  R. L. Winkler Bayesian Models for Forecasting Future Security Prices , 1973 .

[5]  P. Praetz,et al.  The Distribution of Share Price Changes , 1972 .

[6]  N. H. Hakansson. MULTI-PERIOD MEAN-VARIANCE ANALYSIS: TOWARD A GENERAL THEORY OF PORTFOLIO CHOICE* , 1971 .

[7]  E. Fama,et al.  Parameter Estimates for Symmetric Stable Distributions , 1971 .

[8]  N. H. Hakansson. Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection , 1971, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[9]  Basil A. Kalymon Estimation Risk in the Portfolio Selection Model , 1971, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[10]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  The Optimal Portfolio Revision Policy , 1971 .

[11]  N. H. Hakansson. ON OPTIMAL MYOPIC PORTFOLIO POLICIES, WITH AND WITHOUT SERIAL CORRELATION OF YIELDS , 1971 .

[12]  N. H. Hakansson. OPTIMAL INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION STRATEGIES UNDER RISK FOR A CLASS OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS11This paper was presented at the winter meeting of the Econometric Society, San Francisco, California, December, 1966. , 1970 .

[13]  Joel Fried,et al.  Forecasting and Probability Distributions for Models of Portfolio Selection , 1970 .

[14]  James Andrew Bartos,et al.  The assessment of probability distributions for future security prices , 1970 .

[15]  W. Sharpe Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets , 1970 .

[16]  E. Fama Multiperiod Consumption-Investment Decisions , 1970 .

[17]  S. Holstein,et al.  Assessment and evaluation of subjective probability distributions , 1970 .

[18]  N. H. Hakansson. OPTIMAL INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION STRATEGIES UNDER RISK, AN UNCERTAIN LIFETIME, AND INSURANCE* , 1969 .

[19]  P. Samuelson LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION BY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING , 1969 .

[20]  R. C. Merton,et al.  Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case , 1969 .

[21]  H. Levy,et al.  Efficiency analysis of choices involving risk , 1969 .

[22]  E. Fama,et al.  Some Properties of Symmetric Stable Distributions , 1968 .

[23]  J. Mossin Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies , 1968 .

[24]  Keith V. Smith,et al.  A TRANSITION MODEL FOR PORTFOLIO REVISION , 1967 .

[25]  S. James Press,et al.  A Compound Events Model for Security Prices , 1967 .

[26]  James C. T. Mao,et al.  A Decision Theory Approach to Portfolio Selection , 1966 .

[27]  A. A. Walters,et al.  The Theory of Interest Rates , 1965 .

[28]  E. Fama Portfolio Analysis in a Stable Paretian Market , 1965 .

[29]  E. Fama The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices , 1965 .

[30]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[31]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[32]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[33]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .