Efficient analysis of sound propagation in sonic crystals using an ACA–MFS approach

Abstract Sonic crystals have been analysed making use of a variety of strategies, such as those based in the multiple-scattering theory (MST) or in the Finite Element Method (FEM). Recently, some works have proposed the use of the Method of Fundamental Solutions (MFS) and of the Boundary Element Method (BEM). However, considering these numerical techniques, the associated memory requirements and CPU times are usually prohibitive when problems with a large number of scatterers are considered, particularly when 3D problems are addressed. A new strategy for the solution of 3D configurations of sonic crystals is proposed here, based on the use of the MFS (formulated in the frequency domain), considering a 2.5D approach to describe the 3D model. The sound field is synthesised as a summation of much simpler 2D problems, drastically reducing the memory requirements and computational effort of the analysis. To allow the solution of very large-scale problems, with a great amount of scatterers, an Adaptive-Cross-Approximation (ACA) approach is incorporated into the MFS algorithm, rendering faster calculations and significant savings in terms of computational requirements. Examples are presented illustrating the good performance of the proposed methodology and its capacity to properly handle complex large-scale models.

[1]  Sergio Castiñeira-Ibáñez,et al.  Design, Manufacture and Characterization of an Acoustic Barrier Made of Multi-Phenomena Cylindrical Scatterers Arranged in a Fractal-Based Geometry , 2012 .

[2]  António Tadeu,et al.  Three-dimensional wave scattering by a fixed cylindrical inclusion submerged in a fluid medium , 1999 .

[3]  Eleftherios N. Economou,et al.  Multiple-scattering theory for three-dimensional periodic acoustic composites , 1999 .

[4]  Xiao-Xing Su,et al.  Large bandgaps of two-dimensional phononic crystals with cross-like holes , 2011 .

[5]  Z. Hou,et al.  Finite difference time domain method for band-structure calculations of two-dimensional phononic crystals , 2004 .

[6]  P. Amado-Mendes,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Acoustic Barriers with a Diffusive Surface Using a 2.5D Boundary Element Model , 2015 .

[7]  J. V. Sánchez-Pérez,et al.  Acoustic barriers based on periodic arrays of scatterers , 2002 .

[8]  Gui-Lan Yu,et al.  Bandgap calculations of two-dimensional solid–fluid phononic crystals with the boundary element method , 2013 .

[9]  Mario Bebendorf,et al.  Hierarchical Matrices: A Means to Efficiently Solve Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , 2008 .

[10]  Sergej Rjasanow,et al.  Adaptive Cross Approximation of Dense Matrices , 2000 .

[11]  Yue-Sheng Wang,et al.  Wavelet-based method for calculating elastic band gaps of two-dimensional phononic crystals , 2006 .

[12]  P. Sheng,et al.  Focusing of sound in a 3D phononic crystal. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[13]  Jaime Ramis,et al.  Sound Propagation Analysis on Sonic Crystal ElasticStructures using the Method of Fundamental Solutions(MFS) , 2014 .

[14]  Lien-Wen Chen,et al.  Acoustic pressure in cavity of variously sized two-dimensional sonic crystals with various filling fractions , 2009 .

[15]  Anne-Christine Hladky-Hennion,et al.  Absolute forbidden bands and waveguiding in two-dimensional phononic crystal plates , 2008 .

[16]  Mario Martins,et al.  Numerical evaluation of sound attenuation provided by periodic structures , 2013 .

[17]  Naoshi Nishimura,et al.  Recent Advances and Emerging Applications of the Boundary Element Method , 2011 .

[18]  Z. Hou,et al.  Convergence problem of plane-wave expansion method for phononic crystals , 2004 .

[19]  John H. Page,et al.  Elastic Wave Scattering by Periodic Structures of Spherical Objects: Theory and Experiment , 2000 .