Generation of Gradients on a Microfluidic Device: Toward a High-Throughput Investigation of Spermatozoa Chemotaxis

Various research tools have been used for in vitro detection of sperm chemotaxis. However, they are typically poor in maintenance of gradient stability, not to mention their low efficiency. Microfluidic device offers a new experimental platform for better control over chemical concentration gradient than traditional ones. In the present study, an easy-handle diffusion-based microfluidic chip was established. This device allowed for conduction of three parallel experiments on the same chip, and improved the performance of sperm chemotaxis research. In such a chip, there were six channels surrounding a hexagonal pool. The channels are connected to the hexagon by microchannels. Firstly, the fluid flow in the system was characterized; secondly, fluorescein solution was used to calibrate gradient profiles formed in the central hexagon; thirdly, sperm behavior was observed under two concentration gradients of progesterone (100 pM and 1 mM, respectively) as a validation of the device. Significant differences in chemotactic parameters were recognized between experimental and control groups (p < 0.05). Compared with control group, sperm motility was greatly enhanced in 1 mM group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found in 100 pM group. In conclusion, we proposed a microfluidic device for the study of sperm chemotaxis that was capable of generating multi-channel gradients on a chip and would help reduce experimental errors and save time in experiment.

[1]  B. Al-Anzi,et al.  Assays for vertebrate sperm chemotaxis. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[2]  U. Kaupp 100 years of sperm chemotaxis , 2012, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  P. Srinivasan,et al.  Synergistic Effects of 3D ECM and Chemogradients on Neurite Outgrowth and Guidance: A Simple Modeling and Microfluidic Framework , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Mingming Wu,et al.  A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[5]  E. Baldi,et al.  Nongenomic activation of spermatozoa by steroid hormones: Facts and fictions , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[6]  I. Cooke,et al.  Sperm numbers and distribution within the human fallopian tube around ovulation. , 1993, Human reproduction.

[7]  Mingming Wu,et al.  Different Migration Patterns of Sea Urchin and Mouse Sperm Revealed by a Microfluidic Chemotaxis Device , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  A. Pacey,et al.  Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[9]  U. Kaupp,et al.  Mechanisms of sperm chemotaxis. , 2008, Annual review of physiology.

[10]  [Laboratory manual of the WHO for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction]. , 2001, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[11]  M. Eisenbach Sperm chemotaxis. , 1999, Reviews of reproduction.

[12]  Francis Lin,et al.  Microfluidic devices for studying chemotaxis and electrotaxis. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[13]  Chih-kuan Tung,et al.  Cooperative roles of biological flow and surface topography in guiding sperm migration revealed by a microfluidic model. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[14]  M. Eisenbach Mammalian sperm chemotaxis and its association with capacitation. , 1999, Developmental genetics.

[15]  G. Fabro,et al.  Chemotaxis of Capacitated Rabbit Spermatozoa to Follicular Fluid Revealed by a Novel Directionality-Based Assay1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[16]  N. Jeon,et al.  Microfluidic culture platform for neuroscience research , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[17]  N. Burrello,et al.  Effects of progesterone on sperm function: mechanisms of action. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[18]  Jing Yang,et al.  On-Chip Cryopreservation: A Novel Method for Ultra-Rapid Cryoprotectant-Free Cryopreservation of Small Amounts of Human Spermatozoa , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Beum Jun Kim,et al.  Microfluidics for Mammalian Cell Chemotaxis , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  L. Giojalas,et al.  Progesterone at the picomolar range is a chemoattractant for mammalian spermatozoa. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  S. Gupta,et al.  Differential concentration and time dependent effects of progesterone on kinase activity, hyperactivation and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. , 2012, International journal of andrology.

[22]  R. Henkel,et al.  Sperm preparation for ART , 2003, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[23]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Sperm capacitation in humans is transient and correlates with chemotactic responsiveness to follicular factors. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  L. Giojalas,et al.  Molecular Mechanism for Human Sperm Chemotaxis Mediated by Progesterone , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  L. Gatica,et al.  Picomolar gradients of progesterone select functional human sperm even in subfertile samples. , 2013, Molecular human reproduction.

[26]  Lei Wang,et al.  Simultaneous generation of gradients with gradually changed slope in a microfluidic device for quantifying axon response. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  T. Edizione [WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human seminal fluid and the interaction of sperm with cervical mucus]. , 1993, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[28]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  The sperm chemoattractant secreted from human cumulus cells is progesterone. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[29]  Enrico Garaci,et al.  Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita: Preface , 2011 .

[30]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Sperm guidance in mammals — an unpaved road to the egg , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  M. Eisenbach,et al.  Behavioral response of human spermatozoa to a concentration jump of chemoattractants or intracellular cyclic nucleotides. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[32]  D. Beebe,et al.  Sperm motion in a microfluidic fertilization device , 2008, Biomedical microdevices.

[33]  D. Clapham,et al.  Rheotaxis Guides Mammalian Sperm , 2013, Current Biology.

[34]  Weihua Huang,et al.  Quantifying biased response of axon to chemical gradient steepness in a microfluidic device. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.